1990
DOI: 10.1080/0300443900630110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kindergarten and first grade: A time for developing and nurturing gifted behaviors in young children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While generally effective at rating kindergarten children's current abilities, with ratings predictive of performance over 3 years later (Stevenson, Parker, Wilkinson, Hegion, & Fish, 1976), teachers of young children are less effective at identifying giftedness than the children's parents or teachers of older children (Ciha et al, 1974;Jacobs, 1971). Reasons for this could include a teacher tendency to focus on weaknesses despite accompanying advanced behaviors (Delahanty, 1984), lack of teacher training in gifted education (Gear, 1978), and subscription to myths about gifted children (Whitmore, 1982), as well as lack of opportunity for children in an un challenging or lock-step curriculum to reveal abilities (Chance, 1990;Leyden, 1985;Roedell et al, 1980). Observation by teachers can, however, be a useful and sensitive identification tool (Borland & Wright, 1994), especially when training alerts teachers to critical characteristics and the need to observe and document regularly and systematically (Shaklee, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While generally effective at rating kindergarten children's current abilities, with ratings predictive of performance over 3 years later (Stevenson, Parker, Wilkinson, Hegion, & Fish, 1976), teachers of young children are less effective at identifying giftedness than the children's parents or teachers of older children (Ciha et al, 1974;Jacobs, 1971). Reasons for this could include a teacher tendency to focus on weaknesses despite accompanying advanced behaviors (Delahanty, 1984), lack of teacher training in gifted education (Gear, 1978), and subscription to myths about gifted children (Whitmore, 1982), as well as lack of opportunity for children in an un challenging or lock-step curriculum to reveal abilities (Chance, 1990;Leyden, 1985;Roedell et al, 1980). Observation by teachers can, however, be a useful and sensitive identification tool (Borland & Wright, 1994), especially when training alerts teachers to critical characteristics and the need to observe and document regularly and systematically (Shaklee, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%