2015
DOI: 10.5507/bp.2014.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic analysis of preterm newborns' spontaneous movements for postural activity assessment

Abstract: Aims. The objectives of this pilot study were to assess the potential use of 3D videography for analyzing the motion of the body center of mass (COM) in newborns and to determine differences in spontaneous movements between preterm and full-term infants. Methods. The group comprised 10 preterm newborns (gestational age at birth between 26 and 37 weeks; birth weight 800 to 2960 g; gestational age at the time of examination 34 to 39 weeks) and 10 full-term infants (gestational week 38 to 41; birth weight 2810 to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, specialist equipment is again required and the attachment of physical devices to the infant may significantly impact their behavioral and physiological responses, as has already been shown with routine nursing interventions and even environmental noise [28]. To overcome the practical challenges in the studies above, simpler motion analysis strategies have been proposed to capture overall variations in spontaneous movements through assessing the motions of the body center of mass [29]. The latter approach does not, however, provide information about subtle movements such as torso rotations, which are important kinematic features considered in the GMA.…”
Section: Introduction 1backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, specialist equipment is again required and the attachment of physical devices to the infant may significantly impact their behavioral and physiological responses, as has already been shown with routine nursing interventions and even environmental noise [28]. To overcome the practical challenges in the studies above, simpler motion analysis strategies have been proposed to capture overall variations in spontaneous movements through assessing the motions of the body center of mass [29]. The latter approach does not, however, provide information about subtle movements such as torso rotations, which are important kinematic features considered in the GMA.…”
Section: Introduction 1backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlations of movements made between the right leg and left leg, right arm and left arm, right arm and right leg, and right arm and left leg, were all significantly stronger in the infants who had CP (20). Halek and colleagues also used reflective markers in a small study comparing a group of preterm infants recorded at 34-to 39weeks PMA and term infants (274). While they did not follow-up the infants' long-term, they found differences in the range, variability, and velocity of movements between preterm and term infants P a g e | 32 (274).…”
Section: Quantification Of Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Halek and colleagues also used reflective markers in a small study comparing a group of preterm infants recorded at 34-to 39weeks PMA and term infants (274). While they did not follow-up the infants' long-term, they found differences in the range, variability, and velocity of movements between preterm and term infants P a g e | 32 (274). This highlights the need for studies to have patient cohorts of similar gestational ages.…”
Section: Quantification Of Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%