2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2014.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic and kinetic analysis of the inter- and intra-applicator assessment of the Babinski reflex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kinematic data were analysed with AMASS (AMASS, C‐Motion Germantown, MD, USA) and Matlab7 (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA). Leg joint (knee and ankle) and hallux angles were calculated as per previously published conventions (Dafkin et al ., ; Kadaba et al ., ). The variables calculated from these data, for the FWR, were change in angle (degrees) measured from the initial position to the maximum angle of knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion and hallux plantar flexion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Kinematic data were analysed with AMASS (AMASS, C‐Motion Germantown, MD, USA) and Matlab7 (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA). Leg joint (knee and ankle) and hallux angles were calculated as per previously published conventions (Dafkin et al ., ; Kadaba et al ., ). The variables calculated from these data, for the FWR, were change in angle (degrees) measured from the initial position to the maximum angle of knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion and hallux plantar flexion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The muscle activity from the electrodes was recorded, via clip on leads, using PowerLab (ADI Instruments, 26T, Sydney, Australia). Each participant's foot was stroked, by a standard examiner, using a specialized Babinski hammer (Dafkin et al, 2014). A number of design aspects were incorporated into the Babinski hammer to closely resemble the hammer used during every day clinical examination while allowing for the measurement of the force that the hammer exerted on the foot to be recorded (Dafkin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%