Consistent with the fighting hypothesis, left-handers tend to be overrepresented and more successful in interactive sporting contests, including boxing, mixed martial arts, tennis, volleyball, and baseball. While research in this area has focused primarily on the beneficial features of being left-handed, right-handers that manage to excel in these contexts should possess other superior physical attributes in order to compensate for their inherent disadvantage. We term this the right-sided selection hypothesis. Here, we tested this hypothesis in a sample of over 3,500 top adolescent baseball prospects. Left-and right-handed players were compared on the following two dimensions of performance: throwing velocity and sprinting speed. Overall, results showed mixed support for the right-sided selection hypothesis. Right-handers threw with significantly greater velocity than their left-handed counterparts (p Ͻ .01), but there was no difference in the sprinting performance between these groups. The finding for throwing, although representing a small effect overall (d ϭ 0.14), suggests that the left-hand advantage in interactive sporting contests may select for superiority in other physical dimensions among successful right-sided athletes. Moreover, given the role of male overhand throwing during human evolutionary history, the current findings are consistent with the fighting hypothesis.
Public Significance StatementSince left-handed athletes have an advantage in interactive sports, there may be greater competition among the larger pool of right-handed athletes to differentiate themselves. In particular, we predict that, in order to be successful at elite levels, righties need to possess other beneficial traits to overcome their inherent disadvantage. This study provides initial support for this hypothesis and offers directions for future research in this area.