Kinematic and Neurophysiological Consequences of an Assisted-Force-Feedback Brain-Machine Interface Training: A Case Study

Abstract

In a proof-of-principle prototypical demonstration we describe a new type of brain-machine interface (BMI) paradigm for upper limb motor-training. The proposed technique allows a fast contingent and proportionally modulated stimulation of afferent proprioceptive and motor output neural pathways using operant learning. Continuous and immediate assisted-feedback of force proportional to rolandic rhythm oscillations during actual movements was employed and illustrated with a single case experiment. One hemiplegic patient was trained for 2 weeks coupling somatosensory brain oscillations with force-field control during a robot-mediated center-out motor-task whose execution approaches movements of everyday life. The robot facilitated actual movements adding a modulated force directed to the target, thus providing a non-delayed proprioceptive feedback. Neuro-electric, kinematic, and motor-behavioral measures were recorded in pre- and post-assessments without force assistance. Patient’s healthy arm was used as control since neither a placebo control was possible nor other control conditions. We observed a generalized and significant kinematic improvement in the affected arm and a spatial accuracy improvement in both arms, together with an increase and focalization of the somatosensory rhythm changes used to provide assisted-force-feedback. The interpretation of the neurophysiological and kinematic evidences reported here is strictly related to the repetition of the motor-task and the presence of the assisted-force-feedback. Results are described as systematic observations only, without firm conclusions about the effectiveness of the methodology. In this prototypical view, the design of appropriate control conditions is discussed. This study presents a novel operant-learning-based BMI-application for motor-training coupling brain oscillations and force feedback during an actual movement.

Deep Learning-Based Classification of Fine Hand Movements from Low Frequency EEG

“…Several BCI systems for motor rehabilitation or motor control [1][2][3][4][5][6] and other basic neuroscience studies strongly rely on the ability to precisely and effectively distinguish different fine hand movements. One example is the investigation of the neural mechanisms underlying the writing and the music performance [7,8] or during real-life performance in ecologically valid situations outside the laboratory [9].…”

REPAC: Reliable Estimation of Phase-Amplitude Coupling in Brain Networks

“…Then, a more extensive campaign of tests on simulated and real signals should be performed to confirm the preliminary results reported in this contribution. Given its increased detection performance, REPAC paves the road to a more efficient modeling of the PAC that could provide new significant insights for the explanation of brain mechanisms in many different conditions [24,25,26], both healthy and pathological.…”

Magnetoencephalography in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation

“…It is very similar to the peripheral/central Paired Associative Stimulation (PAS) ( 115 ) acting at cellular level and already demonstrated in vitro ( 116 ) and in vivo ( 117 ). This close-to-real-time learning-potentiation training can be implemented by – but not limited to – the combination of operant conditioning based strategies and MEG technology, again because of its high-time and high-spatial resolution [for a review of learning strategies used in BMI field see Silvoni et al ( 118 )]. A proof-of-principle case report exploiting this neural mechanism, describing primarily the methodology of an EEG-based BMI-system without relevant clinical results, proved the technical feasibility of the very close intention-feedback contingency implementation ( 119 ).…”