2017
DOI: 10.1785/0120170111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic Earthquake Ground‐Motion Simulations on Listric Normal Faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To better prepare and help mitigate the risk, improved estimates of ground shaking are required. Furthermore, the importance of accurate knowledge of sedimentary basin shape and fault geometry in improving ground motion simulation estimates of seismic hazard and risk is well established (Day et al, ; Frankel & Vidale, ; Graves et al, ; Komatitsch et al, ; Passone & Mai, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better prepare and help mitigate the risk, improved estimates of ground shaking are required. Furthermore, the importance of accurate knowledge of sedimentary basin shape and fault geometry in improving ground motion simulation estimates of seismic hazard and risk is well established (Day et al, ; Frankel & Vidale, ; Graves et al, ; Komatitsch et al, ; Passone & Mai, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Moreno, Bolte, Klotz, and Melnick (2009) showed that no such isolated slip patches result when using a more realistic non-planar fault geometry, demonstrating that the isolated slip patches were merely an artifact of using a planar fault. Using non-planar faults instead of planar faults can also lead to more realistic near-fault ground motion calculations (Passone & Mai, 2017), help the understanding of the physics of fault ruptures (Aochi, Fukuyama, & Matsu'ura, 2000), and hence improve seismic hazard assessments (Aochi & Fukuyama, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the largest earthquake recorded at the MF (6.8 ± 0.4) is regarded to support the assumption of a listric fault with an active basal detachment that links the normal fault with the VBTF strike-slip system. The consequences of this geometry may be large in terms of ground motion patterns resulting from earthquakes that activate large parts of the listric fault because of the hanging wall effect that amplifies the ground motion prediction (Passone and Mai, 2017). Although such directivity effects may reduce the hazard arising from the MF for Vienna, the opposite is true for other listric faults stretching into the city limits of Vienna (Fig.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Seismic Hazard Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%