2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-1874-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic modeling and error sensitivity analysis for on-machine five-axis laser scanning measurement under machine geometric errors and workpiece setup errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nishikawa et al [10] indicate that the use of a laser sensor in a multi-axis machine yields quite similar results to the measurements of turbine blade sections obtained on a CMM. Ibaraki et al [4] also use a laser displacement sensor to measure different profiles on an axi-symmetrical part. To improve quality, they propose a kinematic model of the machine which brings out each contribution of various types of errors affecting the measurement with the aim of improving quality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nishikawa et al [10] indicate that the use of a laser sensor in a multi-axis machine yields quite similar results to the measurements of turbine blade sections obtained on a CMM. Ibaraki et al [4] also use a laser displacement sensor to measure different profiles on an axi-symmetrical part. To improve quality, they propose a kinematic model of the machine which brings out each contribution of various types of errors affecting the measurement with the aim of improving quality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ibaraki et al [11] implemented the LDS on the spindle of a five-axis cradle machine tool and introduced an asynchronous calibration method for determining the beam direction and zero position of the sensor. The influence of the position and direction errors of the workpiece relative to the machine's rotation axis and the geometric error of the rotation axis on the measurement results were analyzed [12]. However, this method is not applicable to five-axis gantry machine tools.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their proposed model facilitates quantitative error estimation of task-specific measurement outcomes and paves the way for future error correction. Ibaraki et al further examined the geometric error modeling in an five-axis on-line measurement setup [65,66], achieved by integrating a laser displacement sensor into a vertical five-axis machine tool. By constructing an error prediction model that encompasses both the linear and rotary axes, they effectively assessed the influence of geometric errors on measured profiles, and provided a demonstration experiment on the profile measurement of an axis-symmetrical part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%