2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10714-013-1653-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic quantum states for the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity

Abstract: A space of kinematic quantum states for the Teleparallel Equivalent of General Relativity is constructed by means of projective techniques. The states are kinematic in this sense that their construction bases merely on the structure of the phase space of the theory and does not take into account constraints on it. The space of quantum states is meant to serve as an element of a canonical background independent quantization of the theory.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the constructions described in [1] and [5] are particular examples of the construction presented in [4]. Thus the result to be achieved here means that the families {D λ , π λλ ′ } λ∈Λ obtained in these three papers can be seen as originating from families of factorized Hilbert spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, the constructions described in [1] and [5] are particular examples of the construction presented in [4]. Thus the result to be achieved here means that the families {D λ , π λλ ′ } λ∈Λ obtained in these three papers can be seen as originating from families of factorized Hilbert spaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In the original paper [1] this idea was applied to linear phase spaces. Further development of the projective construction presented in [3,4,5,6,7] consisted in applying this idea to more and more general phase spaces including finally the one underlying Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG).…”
Section: Projective Construction Of Quantum States and Its Possible Flawmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The need to include surfaces in the labels was already recognized by Okołów in [24,25]. The label set he was using is however not immediately applicable to the non-Abelian case, which requires, as we will see, to impose more restrictive conditions on the relative disposition of the edges and surfaces.…”
Section: Label Setmentioning
confidence: 99%