2012
DOI: 10.3934/jgm.2012.4.207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematic reduction and the Hamilton-Jacobi equation

Abstract: A close relationship between the classical Hamilton-\ud Jacobi theory and the kinematic reduction of control systems by\ud decoupling vector fields is shown in this paper. The geometric interpretation\ud of this relationship relies on new mathematical techniques\ud for mechanics defined on a skew-symmetric algebroid. This\ud geometric structure allows us to describe in a simplified way the\ud mechanics of nonholonomic systems with both control and external\ud forces.Peer ReviewedPreprin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This Lie bracket verifies the usual properties of a Lie bracket except the Jacobi identity (see [1] for example). …”
Section: Description Of Nonholonomic Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Lie bracket verifies the usual properties of a Lie bracket except the Jacobi identity (see [1] for example). …”
Section: Description Of Nonholonomic Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As when we work in tangent bundles, it is possible to determine the Christoffel symbols associated with the connection ∇ G D by ∇ G D eB e C = Γ A BC e A . Note that the coefficients Γ C AB of the connection ∇ G D are (see [1] for details)…”
Section: B Nonholonomic Mechanical Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where γ : I ⊂ R → D is a ρD-admissible curve [2]. In terms of control inputs, Equation (6) can be rewritten as…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locally D (2) is described by the vanishing of the constraintsq i − (ρD) i A y A = 0 on T D, where local coordinates on T D are (q i , y A ,q i ,ẏ A ) and coordintes on D (2) are determined by (q i , y A ,ẏ A ) where the inclusion from D (2) to T D, denoted by i D (2) : D (2) → T D is given by…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%