2018
DOI: 10.1049/joe.2018.8265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematics analysis and experiment of a lily picking mechanical arm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The kinematics and picking experiments of the robotic arm were carried out in the experimental field in the natural environment through the robotic physics machine platform. The results show that the position error of the robot arm from the end of the arm is less than 12 mm, and the picking success rate is 83.33% [4]. The related research did not pay attention to saving the data of the manipulator, and even did not simulate the trajectory of the manipulator.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The kinematics and picking experiments of the robotic arm were carried out in the experimental field in the natural environment through the robotic physics machine platform. The results show that the position error of the robot arm from the end of the arm is less than 12 mm, and the picking success rate is 83.33% [4]. The related research did not pay attention to saving the data of the manipulator, and even did not simulate the trajectory of the manipulator.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For continuous distribution functions, the inverse cumulative distribution function can be used for sampling. 4 Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Supposing the distribution function of the sample random variable X is FðXÞ, and the function FðXÞ is continuous. Its inverse cumulative distribution function is also its inverse function, denoted as F −1 ðzÞ, 0 ≤ z ≤ 1.…”
Section: Cauchy Distribution Function Data Sampling Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the 10-degree-of-freedom under-driven three-finger hand [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] developed by Gosselin's group at Laval University in Canada, which is the international leader in the under-driven multi-finger hand control, uses only two motors, one motor is responsible for the grasping opening and closing motion of three fingers, and the other motor completes the finger steering. Rodriguze et al, developed a 15-degree-of-freedom single-motor-driven multi-finger hand, which can achieve safe and reliable grasping without any sensors and feedback control [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%