“…Rather than trying to apply a conventional view of a LANF in an extensional setting in which high temperature mylonites are exhumed in the footwall of an ongoing normal fault detachment, progressively rotated into a sub‐horizontal position, and overprinted by brittle deformation [e.g., Mancktelow , 1990], we find evidence of a more complex sequence of deformation stages for the formation of LANFs in contractional settings such as the STDS in the Himalaya. We propose (Figure 10) that the broad, sub‐horizontal layer of top‐to‐the‐north ductile shear at the top of the GHS sometimes referred to in the literature as the “lower” component of the STDS and exposed at the base of the Bhutan klippen (outer STDS), at Dzakaa Chu, along the crest of the Himalaya (e.g., Lhotse detachment, Everest; Annapurna detachment, central Nepal) and in the cores of some of the North Himalayan gneiss domes (e.g., Kangmar Dome) [e.g., Burchfiel et al , 1992; Lee et al , 2000; Grujic et al , 2002; Searle et al , 2003; Cottle et al , 2007; Kellett et al , 2010; Searle , 2010; Wagner et al , 2010] is an extensive, diffuse, sheared layer at the boundary between mid‐ and upper crust that deformed as the result of south‐directed mid‐crustal flow [ Beaumont et al , 2001; Jamieson et al , 2004] during the Early Middle Miocene.…”