2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematics of an Alpine rock glacier from multi-temporal UAV surveys and GNSS data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The applied method was exploratory and might suffer some deficiencies. However, the order of magnitude of the subsidence rate due to the melting of excess ice estimated on Aget GFL A fits with observations made recently on various rock glaciers in the European Alps 51,53,54 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The applied method was exploratory and might suffer some deficiencies. However, the order of magnitude of the subsidence rate due to the melting of excess ice estimated on Aget GFL A fits with observations made recently on various rock glaciers in the European Alps 51,53,54 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As such, the so-called UAV-SfM photogrammetric workflows have been used in different domains, such as the monitoring of landslide kinematics (Lucieer et al, 2013;Clapuyt et al, 2017) and for studying glacial (Ryan et al, 2015;Fugazza et al, 2018;Rossini et al, 2018;Benoit et al, 2019) and periglacial processes (Eichel et al, 2020;Hendrickx et al, 2020), among other applications. Until now, only a few study cases have reported on rock glacier monitoring by relying exclusively on UAV-SfM techniques (Dall'Asta et al, 2017;Vivero and Lambiel, 2019;Halla et al, 2021;Bearzot et al, 2022) or by a combination of UAV-SfM with additional remote sensing data (Kaufmann et al, 2018;Groh and Blöthe, 2019;Fey and Krainer, 2020;Blöthe et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adopting a plastic model for the rock glacier thickness and standard values of the material parameters (ω i = 0.7, ρ = 1500 kg m −3 , Ø = 25 • , τ cθ = 10 kPa, n = 2.1 and . γc = 0.06 a −1 ) [17], the formulation of the BCF can be approximated to:…”
Section: The Bulk Creep Factor and Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies of rock glacier dynamics concentrate on surface displacements and morphology changes [15][16][17], whereas some other on their internal structure [13,18,19] and liquid water content [12], trying to understand the factors that force rock glacier responses across different temporal and spatial scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%