2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1251-8050(00)01484-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematics of faults between Subbetic Units during the Miocene (central sector of the Betic Cordillera)

Abstract: -The kinematic analysis of the low-angle faults that separate the major units of the Subbetic Zone indicates two main stages of translations. In the first stage, of Burdigalian to basal Tortonian age, the hanging walls moved toward the WSW, and thrusts developed in some sectors of the External Zones. Simultaneously, in the Internal Zones, the activity of extensional detachments shows the same kinematics. In the second stage, affecting up to basal Tortonian rocks, northwest-verging thrusts were active. The Subb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Internal-External Zone Boundary (IEZB) separates the Internal Zones from the External Zones. The IEZB forms a low angle detachment (N50E strike and 25 dip to NW) in the studied area with a top-to-the-W sense of movement (Galindo-Zaldívar et al 2000). Towards the west it bends into an E-W direction.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The Internal-External Zone Boundary (IEZB) separates the Internal Zones from the External Zones. The IEZB forms a low angle detachment (N50E strike and 25 dip to NW) in the studied area with a top-to-the-W sense of movement (Galindo-Zaldívar et al 2000). Towards the west it bends into an E-W direction.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The study area (Figures and ) comprises the northern front of the Betic Cordillera in contact with the southern margin of the eastern Guadalquivir Basin, where the Subbetic and Prebetic carbonate rocks outline an east‐west mountain front almost parallel to the basin axis (Figure ). North to this front, the basin is occupied by the set of allochthonous and chaotic‐like units that we will call Guadalquivir Units (GUs), following the authors that recognized some grade of tectonic structuration (Figure ), at least at local scales [ García‐Rosell , ; Guezou et al ., ; Galindo‐Zaldívar et al ., ; Platt et al ., ; Ruano et al ., ].…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the western Betics, the main alpine deformation of the External Zones is characterized by NW‐vergent fold‐and‐thrusts post‐Early Burdigalian in age, which are the youngest sediments involved in the deformation [e.g., Crespo‐Blanc and Campos , 2001]. The thrusts that deform the Internal Subbetic units consistently give displacements of the hanging wall toward the NW/WNW [ Kirker and Platt , 1998; Crespo‐Blanc and Campos , 2001; Platt et al , 1995; Galindo‐Zaldívar et al , 2001; Platt et al , 2003; Frizon de Lamotte et al , 2004; Crespo‐Blanc and Frizon de Lamotte , 2006; Balanyá et al , 2007; Crespo‐Blanc , 2007]. Toward the frontal sector of the western Betics, however, the Median and External Subbetic fold‐and‐thrust belt is completely disrupted.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deformation of External Zones along the central and western Betic Cordillera is characterized by a detached fold‐and‐thrust sequence, generally NE‐SW to ENE‐WSW trending, as well as by structures oblique to the tectonic transport direction [ Kirker and McClelland , 1996; Kirker and Platt , 1998; Crespo‐Blanc and Campos , 2001; Galindo‐Zaldívar et al , 2001; Platt et al , 2003; Frizon de Lamotte et al , 2004; Crespo‐Blanc and Frizon de Lamotte , 2006; Balanyá et al , 2007; Crespo‐Blanc , 2007]. The frontal sector of the External Zones progressively acquires complexity toward the west.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%