Kinematics of the quadrate bone during feeding in mallard ducks

Abstract

SUMMARYAvian cranial kinesis, in which mobility of the quadrate, pterygoid and palatine bones contribute to upper bill elevation, is believed to occur in all extant birds. The most widely accepted model for upper bill elevation is that the quadrate rotates rostrally and medially towards the pterygoid, transferring force to the mobile pterygoid-palatine complex, which pushes on the upper bill. Until now, however, it has not been possible to test this hypothesis in vivo because quadrate motions are rapid, three-dimensionally complex and not visible externally. Here we use a new in vivo X-ray motion analysis technique, X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM), to create precise (±0.06mm) 3-D animations of the quadrate, braincase, upper bill and mandible of three mallard ducks, Anas platyrhynchos. We defined a joint coordinate system (JCS) for the quadrato-squamosal joint with the axes aligned to the anatomical planes of the skull. In this coordinate system, the quadrate's 3-D rotations produce an elliptical path of pterygoid process motion, with medial and rostrodorsal then lateral and rostrodorsal motion as the upper bill elevates. As the upper bill depresses, the pterygoid process continues along the ellipsoidal path, with lateral and caudoventral then medial and caudoventral motion. We also found that the mandibular rami bow outwards (streptognathy) during mandibular depression, which may cause the lateral component of quadrate rotation that we observed. Relative to the JCS aligned with the anatomical planes of the skull, a second JCS aligned with quadrato-squamosal joint anatomy did not produce a simpler description of quadrate kinematics. Supplementary material available online at

Role of axial muscles in powering mouth expansion during suction feeding in Largemouth Bass

“…S1), the kinematics of each bone of the dorsal (neurocranium) and ventral (urohyal and cleithrum) expansion units were calculated relative to a body-based reference, the body plane (Figs 3,4). Anatomical coordinate systems were used to describe the kinematics of each bone as biologically relevant translations and rotations (Brainerd et al, 2010;Dawson et al, 2011;Gidmark et al, 2012), and the motion of each bone A B C D Fig. 3.…”

The shapes of bird beaks are highly controlled by nondietary factors

“…Birds have highly mobile skulls comprising multiple parts that are able to move during feeding, including a flexible region, or "hinge," separating the beak and braincase into two kinetic modules (32,39,40). Despite generating beak movement, the adductor muscles never exert force directly on to the upper beak.…”

Feeding behaviour of broiler chickens: a review on the biomechanical characteristics

“…insects (Dangles et al, 2006;Wu et al, 2008;Nguyen et al, 2010;Truong et al, 2012); fish (Korff & Wainwright, 2004;Herrel et al, 2005;Huber et al, 2008;Wroe et al, 2008;Huber et al, 2009;Mara et al, 2009;Habegger et al, 2010;Tran et al, 2010); rodents (Bracha et al, 2003;Sakatani & Isa, 2004;Herbin et al, 2007;Morita et al, 2008;Beare et al, 2009;Fu et al, 2009;Stefen et al, 2011); reptiles (Deban & O'Reilly, 2005;Herrel & O'Reilly, 2006;Fuller et al, 2011;Schaerlaeken et al, 2011); birds (Westneat et al, 1993;Estrella & Masero, 2007;Abourachid et al, 2011;Dawson et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2011); as well as in humans (Arampatzis et al, 1999;Yoganandan et al, 2002;Imura et al, 2008;Shan, 2008;Bakker et al, 2009;Steeve, 2010). The main topics treated are flight features, bite force analysis, cognitive functions assessments by realtime tracking, anatomical and physiological study of locomotion, evaluation of mandibular motion and muscle activity during ingestion or vocalization, the effect of food type on feeding efficiency, 3-D bones reconstruction for motion morphology assessments, among others.…”