2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinematics of the shoulder joint in tennis players

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study used ultrasonographic evaluation to measure subacromial space, confirming the hypothesis that tennis players may develop subacromial impingement. The impact of shoulder and scapular kinematics to shoulder impingement was studied by Lädermann and colleagues [33]. Their findings indicated that nine out of 10 ex-professional tennis players were found to have posterosuperior shoulder impingement, especially when serving, strengthening the theory that this stroke is the most harmful stroke in tennis.…”
Section: Dyskinesiamentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study used ultrasonographic evaluation to measure subacromial space, confirming the hypothesis that tennis players may develop subacromial impingement. The impact of shoulder and scapular kinematics to shoulder impingement was studied by Lädermann and colleagues [33]. Their findings indicated that nine out of 10 ex-professional tennis players were found to have posterosuperior shoulder impingement, especially when serving, strengthening the theory that this stroke is the most harmful stroke in tennis.…”
Section: Dyskinesiamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Type of Study Participants Sample Size Risk Factor Examined [22] Cross-sectional study Competitive junior tennis players N = 35, (M = 19, F = 16) Scapulothoracic position, muscle strength, flexibility [27] Cross-sectional study Competitive adult tennis players N = 59, (M = 31, F = 28) Age-related shoulder/scapular adaptions [32] Controlled laboratory study Collegiate tennis players N = 16' (M) Racket grip size [24] Cross-sectional study Competitive adult tennis players N = 55, (M) Racket properties [13] Prospective 2-year study Competitive junior tennis players N = 55, (M = 35, F = 20) Previous injury [23] Laboratory-based study Competitive junior tennis players N = 51, (M = 29, F = 22) Flexibility and range of motion [33] Laboratory study Ex-professional senior tennis players N = 10, (M = 9, F = 1) Glenohumeral instability and shoulder impingement [21] Cross Influence of fatigue on scapular kinematics [35] Laboratory-based study Competitive adult tennis players N = 8, (M = 8) Scapulothoracic kinematics [26] Laboratory-based study Competitive adult tennis players N = 8, (M = 8) Racket polar moment of inertia [36] Cross-sectional study Competitive junior tennis players N = 40, (M = 26, F = 14) Shoulder rotational muscle imbalances [37] Cross-sectional study Competitive junior tennis players N = 53, (M = 31, F = 22) Correlation between scapular dyskinesia and subacromial space [25] Cross-sectional study Competitive adult tennis players N = 400, (M = 323, F = 77) Racket grip N = number of participants; M = male participants; F = female participants. [29] Effect of prolonged tennis to shoulder muscle fatigue 13 (26) [20] Effect of prolonged tennis to shoulder range of motion 10 (26) [31] Prolonged tennis may affect shoulder articular cartilage 12 (26) [28] Effect of prolonged tennis on glenohumeral rotation 14 (26) [13] Previous injury 11 (26) 2 [34] 13 (26…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subacromial impingement remained low. We did not note shoulder instability in this population, as demonstrated in our previous study [7,16]. Moreover, all subjects had a competent rotator cuff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Complete anterior acromioplasty should be avoided in the setting of a massive tear as it may put coracoacromial ligament at risk and lead to postoperative anterosuperior subluxation of humeral head [50]. As it is reported that lateral acromion might be responsible for more impingement than the anterior part [51] some recommend lateral acromioplasty in addition to limited anterior acromioplasty [52,53]. Despite these concerns, however, when Rockwood et al [54] first proposed open debridement for treatment of massive cuff tears in 1995, he performed it with aggressive acromioplasty and complete release of the coracoacromial ligament.…”
Section: Arthroscopic Debridement With or Without Long Head Of The Bimentioning
confidence: 99%