2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic analysis of C-S-H growth on calcite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
8
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonlinear regression of the C−S−H ideal solid solution model with the two end members given in Table 2 provides nearly as good an agreement with published solubility data as other solid solution models, and the solubility constants given in Table 3 are those that yield the minimum sum of squared residuals (SSR) for those compositions, as described fully in Reference [47]. The rate constants and form of the rate law for C−S−H growth, dNCSHdt=kCSHACSHfalse(βTot1false)3 are those shown to provide the closest agreement to recent experimental measurements of C−S−H growth on calcite crystals [44]. In Eq.…”
Section: Computer Simulationssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonlinear regression of the C−S−H ideal solid solution model with the two end members given in Table 2 provides nearly as good an agreement with published solubility data as other solid solution models, and the solubility constants given in Table 3 are those that yield the minimum sum of squared residuals (SSR) for those compositions, as described fully in Reference [47]. The rate constants and form of the rate law for C−S−H growth, dNCSHdt=kCSHACSHfalse(βTot1false)3 are those shown to provide the closest agreement to recent experimental measurements of C−S−H growth on calcite crystals [44]. In Eq.…”
Section: Computer Simulationssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…HydratiCA does not attempt to explicitly model these individual globules, but considers a fundamental growth unit of C−S−H to include several clusters of these globules together with saturated intercluster pores. The intercluster porosity is assumed to be 70 % by volume and saturated with aqueous solution [44]. The water in the porosity is assumed to be available for further reactions, except for 2.2 formula units of physically adsorbed water per formula unit of SiO 2 in C−S−H [36].…”
Section: Computer Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The derivation process of the dissolution rate of C‐S‐H is more complicated because (i) the solid phase is like a solid solution with end‐member activities each different from one, (ii) water is involved as a reactant and not just a catalyst in the overall reaction, and (iii) the surface area of C‐S‐H is difficult to measure in the saturated state. As a simplification, if the phase C‐S‐H is approximated as a stoichiometric solid with fixed composition (meaning that its activity in the standard state is equal to one by definition), and if the activity of water in pore solution is also approximated as one, the dissolution of C‐S‐H can be expressed as,normalCxSHy+false(1+xyfalse)normalH2OxCa2++normalH3SiO4+false(2x1false)OH,andtrueN˙CSH=kCSHfACSH)(1QnormalCnormalSnormalHKnormaleq_normalCnormalSnormalH3,where N˙normalCnormalSnormalH is the net dissolution rate, knormalCnormalSnormalHf is the kinetic rate constant, A C‐S‐H is the surface area, Q C‐S‐H and K eq_C‐S‐H are the activity product and equilibrium activity product of C‐S‐H, respectively . Within the computational program developed in this study, C‐S‐H is not treated as a single stoichiometric phase, but as a solid solution consisting of multiple stoichiometric components (e.g.…”
Section: Conceptualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dissolution rate for each component of C‐S‐H, and thus the overall C‐S‐H dissolution rate, can be calculated using Equation . For all components that form C‐S‐H, the same value of knormalCnormalSnormalHf was applied, and this value has been inferred experimentally to be approximately 1.5 × 10 −10 mol m −2 s −1 ; this value is within the range of rate constants determined for C‐S‐H by Trapote‐Barreira et al . Note that this inferred rate constant was measured experimentally when C‐S‐H is growing rather than dissolving, and an assumption was made that the kinetic rate constants are the same for dissolution as for growth.…”
Section: Conceptualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the lateral direction (ie, parallel to the substrate's surface), the growth rate is isotropic; however, in the longitudinal direction (ie, perpendicular to the substrate's surface), the outward growth rate ( G out ) is double the rate in the lateral direction. Such anisotropy in product's growth has been implemented to mimic the actual geometry of C–S–H's early‐age growth, as observed in experiments . The temporal variation in growth rate is based on an implementation originally formulated by Bullard et al, and subsequently adopted in several studies, to capture changes in C–S–H's growth rate in relation to its supersaturation in the solution.…”
Section: Phase Boundary Nucleation and Growth Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%