2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic and cardiovascular comparison of immediate-release isradipine and sustained-release isradipine among non-treatment-seeking, cocaine-dependent individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since a 90% CI for C max and AUCs ratios were ranging within the limits of the FDA (80-125%), it was determined that the two types of 5 mg SR isradipine formulations were considered to be bioequivalent. In previous reports, absorption of an orally administrated IR isradipine capsule in the fasting condition was rapid with 1.2-2.0 h of T max and 6.1-13.8 h of elimination half-life (T 1/2 ) [16][17][18]21]. SR isradipine capsules took about 3-4 times longer (6 h) for the T max compared to IR isradipine.…”
Section: Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Study In Healthymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Since a 90% CI for C max and AUCs ratios were ranging within the limits of the FDA (80-125%), it was determined that the two types of 5 mg SR isradipine formulations were considered to be bioequivalent. In previous reports, absorption of an orally administrated IR isradipine capsule in the fasting condition was rapid with 1.2-2.0 h of T max and 6.1-13.8 h of elimination half-life (T 1/2 ) [16][17][18]21]. SR isradipine capsules took about 3-4 times longer (6 h) for the T max compared to IR isradipine.…”
Section: Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Study In Healthymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Plasma concentrations of isradipine were in the standard curve range and remained above the LLOQ (10 pg/mL) for the entire sampling period except for one subject at 0.66 h, one subject at 1 h, one subject at 24 h, and one subject at 36 h after dosing. Even though the bioavailability of orally administered isradipine was characterized by considerable interindividual variation [16,19,21], the plasma profiles of the mean isradipine concentration versus time after oral administration of a single dose of both formulations in 24 subjects exhibited closely similar patterns. The mean estimated pharmacokinetic parameters derived from the plasma concentration profiles of isradipine are shown in Table 2 for the formulation effect in all tested parameters).…”
Section: Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Bioequivalence Study In Healthymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations