2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.113671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic arrest behavior in Ni-Co-Mn-Sn alloys within the phase boundary between martensite and strain glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the M-T curve at 5 T exhibits a smaller ∆M and larger hysteresis compared to those at 1 T and 2 T. It can be attributed to the presence of point defects, precipitates and local nonhomogeneous stress, which contribute to hindering the nucleation and/or propagation of martensite and reducing the mobility of the habit plane between the austenite and martensite [41]. Thus, a portion of FM austenite is persisted at low temperatures by the large magnetic field, which is known as the 'transformation arrest' phenomenon [1,42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the M-T curve at 5 T exhibits a smaller ∆M and larger hysteresis compared to those at 1 T and 2 T. It can be attributed to the presence of point defects, precipitates and local nonhomogeneous stress, which contribute to hindering the nucleation and/or propagation of martensite and reducing the mobility of the habit plane between the austenite and martensite [41]. Thus, a portion of FM austenite is persisted at low temperatures by the large magnetic field, which is known as the 'transformation arrest' phenomenon [1,42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Among these materials, Heusler alloys have received more attention and research studies due to the rich ferromagnetic (FM)/antiferromagnetic (AFM) martensitic transformations. [11][12][13] Long et al prepared common Ni 55. 5 Mn 20 Ga 24.5 and Ni 54.9 Mn 20.5 Ga 24.6 polycrystalline alloys with ΔS of 15.1 and 13.1 J kg −1 K −1 , but their magnetocaloric effects are not ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%