This version is available at https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/53526/ Strathprints is designed to allow users to access the research output of the University of Strathclyde. Unless otherwise explicitly stated on the manuscript, Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any profitmaking activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute both the url (https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/) and the content of this paper for research or private study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge.Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the Strathprints administrator: strathprints@strath.ac.ukThe Strathprints institutional repository (https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk) is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs. It has been developed to disseminate open access research outputs, expose data about those outputs, and enable the management and persistent access to Strathclyde's intellectual output.
AbstractTorrefaction changes the elementary composition of biomass and moves it towards bituminous coal, and accordingly, torrefaction based co-firing system in a pulverized coal boiler have been proved as a promising option for direct co-firing with a large percentage of biomass.This work investigated the performance of torrefaction based co-firing power plant, especially, discussed the roles of torrefaction degree and biomass co-firing ratio in a 220MWe pulverizedfuel power plant. Biomass torrefaction tests were performed at temperature of 200°C, 250°C, 270°C, and 300°C, respectively, and each case was kept same residence time of 30 minutes. A series of analyses were carried out to understand the impacts of torrefaction degree and biomass co-firing ratio on CO 2 emission, process operation, and electricity efficiency. According to the results, it is concluded that CO 2 and CO are the main components of torrefied gases. Averagely, CO 2 and CO account 79% and 18% of total gases in volume fraction in four studied cases. From an energy saving perspective, a deep torrefaction is not recommended, because the energy saved from biomass grinding is less than that consumed by the extra torrefaction process. The results also showed that the electrical efficiency reduced with increasing of either torrefaction degree or substitution ratio of biomass.