2014
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31829a36a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Comparison of the Power Development Between Power Clean Variations

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare the power production of the hang clean (HC), jump shrug (JS), and high pull (HP) when performed at different relative loads. Seventeen men with previous HC training experience, performed 3 repetitions each of the HC, JS, and HP at relative loads of 30, 45, 65, and 80% of their 1 repetition maximum (1RM) HC on a force platform over 3 different testing sessions. Peak power output (PPO), peak force (PF), and peak velocity (PV) of the lifter plus bar system during each repe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

11
111
2
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
11
111
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the high velocity end of the force-velocity curve features weightlifting derivatives that are more ballistic in nature and typically use lighter loads. The placement of the jump shrug and hang high pull on the force-velocity curve is supported by previous research demonstrating that the jump shrug (104,105) and the hang high pull (104) produced higher velocities compared with the hang power clean. Moreover, previous research also indicates that these exercises may be best prescribed using lighter loads to maximize power and velocity (60,92,94,(102)(103)(104)(105).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, the high velocity end of the force-velocity curve features weightlifting derivatives that are more ballistic in nature and typically use lighter loads. The placement of the jump shrug and hang high pull on the force-velocity curve is supported by previous research demonstrating that the jump shrug (104,105) and the hang high pull (104) produced higher velocities compared with the hang power clean. Moreover, previous research also indicates that these exercises may be best prescribed using lighter loads to maximize power and velocity (60,92,94,(102)(103)(104)(105).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The placement of the jump shrug and hang high pull on the force-velocity curve is supported by previous research demonstrating that the jump shrug (104,105) and the hang high pull (104) produced higher velocities compared with the hang power clean. Moreover, previous research also indicates that these exercises may be best prescribed using lighter loads to maximize power and velocity (60,92,94,(102)(103)(104)(105). Additional research also supports the placement of the power clean, power clean from the knee, and midthigh power clean based on the 1RM (i.e., greater force or less force) that may be achieved for each exercise (56).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations