1986
DOI: 10.1063/1.450497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic energy dependence of Al++O2→AlO++O

Abstract: The ~dothermic ~ea~ion of AI + with O 2 is studied using a guided ion-beam apparatus. The reaction cross section IS measured as a function of kinetic energy from 0 to 20 eV. The threshold energy for the reaction, Eo, is determined from an empirical model to be 3.64 ± 0.04 eV. Phase s~~ calculations of the cross section performed with Eo as the only adjustable parameter yield a similar result, Eo = 3.60 ± 0.02 eV, and predict the absolute magnitude of the reaction cross sectio~ wi~ experime~tal error. We conser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This energy threshold difference can be approximately accounted for using a simple line-of-centers like form, σ (E) = σ 0 (E -E 0 ) n /E, coupled with a simple model previously described for the probability of further dissociation of the AuH + (AuD + ) products to Au + +H (D). 30 The best reproduction of the QCT results yields values of the parameter n very close to those found to reproduce the experimental results, namely, n = 1.5 -1.6. 22 Using this model, with n = 1.5 − 1.6 and the experimental E 0 value (0.3 eV lower than the ab initio one), together with the convolution procedure described above, the results reproduced the experimental points very well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This energy threshold difference can be approximately accounted for using a simple line-of-centers like form, σ (E) = σ 0 (E -E 0 ) n /E, coupled with a simple model previously described for the probability of further dissociation of the AuH + (AuD + ) products to Au + +H (D). 30 The best reproduction of the QCT results yields values of the parameter n very close to those found to reproduce the experimental results, namely, n = 1.5 -1.6. 22 Using this model, with n = 1.5 − 1.6 and the experimental E 0 value (0.3 eV lower than the ab initio one), together with the convolution procedure described above, the results reproduced the experimental points very well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…29 We account for this by explicitly convoluting the QCT results with the kinetic and internal energy distributions of the reactants using the data analysis program CRUNCH. 30 These convoluted cross sections are shown as red lines in Fig. 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted above, the dissociation process 5 can begin at D 0 (H 2 ) ϭ 4.478 eV. To account for this new process, we incorporate another empirical representation of the kinetic energy dependence of this secondary process, as described in detail elsewhere [38]. In the analysis shown in Figure 5, the model holds the threshold for the dissociation process 5 at its thermodynamic value, adjusting only a parameter that describes the rapidity of the decline.…”
Section: Translational Motion Of the Reactants: Doppler Broadeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b Chambaud et al (1997). c Weber et al (1986). that these terms are less sensitive to the level of theory used (see for instance Gaw & Handy 1986).…”
Section: Benchmarks On the Ground Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AlO + cation was detected by Armentrout and coworkers as a product of the reaction between Al + ( 1 S) with O 2 , NO 2 , N 2 O, and CO 2 (Clemmer et al 1992;Weber et al 1986). Petrie (2006) reported the formation of AlO + cations in the mesosphere where they form after reactions of Al + resulting from meteoritic ablation from surrounding O-containing species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%