2010
DOI: 10.1021/bi1000118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Evidence for the Sequential Association of Insulin Binding Sites 1 and 2 to the Insulin Receptor and the Influence of Receptor Isoform,

Abstract: Through binding to and signaling via the insulin receptor (IR), insulin is involved in multiple effects on growth and metabolism. The current model for the insulin-IR binding process is one of a biphasic reaction. It is thought that the insulin peptide possesses two binding interfaces (sites 1 and 2), which allow it to bridge the two alpha-subunits of the insulin receptor during the biphasic binding reaction. The sequential order of the binding events involving sites 1 and 2, as well as the molecular interacti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the orientation of R‐insulin in our model is consistent with ligand crosslinking of receptor subunits76 because the ligand can maintain simultaneous contact at site‐1 with L1 and at site‐2 with the (F1–F2)′ loops. These observations are also in accord with a proposed sequential model of association of insulin‐binding sites 1 and 2 to IR 79. As a next step, this new structural model also helps explain recognition of IR by homologous (to insulin) noncognate ligands such as a single‐chain polypeptide insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF1), which cannot undergo significant separation of its C‐domain due to single‐chain structural constraints.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Also, the orientation of R‐insulin in our model is consistent with ligand crosslinking of receptor subunits76 because the ligand can maintain simultaneous contact at site‐1 with L1 and at site‐2 with the (F1–F2)′ loops. These observations are also in accord with a proposed sequential model of association of insulin‐binding sites 1 and 2 to IR 79. As a next step, this new structural model also helps explain recognition of IR by homologous (to insulin) noncognate ligands such as a single‐chain polypeptide insulin‐like growth factor‐1 (IGF1), which cannot undergo significant separation of its C‐domain due to single‐chain structural constraints.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This is not possible in the dimer form [53][56]. Obstruction of the classical binding site by removal of the first four amino acids in the A-chain (desA1-4) was shown to decrease binding affinities to 0.014% relative to HI [57] and fixation of the C-terminal end of the B-chain in SCI resulted in a loss of in vivo activity [55]. In contrast, the second binding site is still fully exposed and available for receptor binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to now, two isoforms of the insulin receptor have been described, that is, IR‐A and B (IR‐B) . Both isoforms are expressed in insulin‐sensitive tissues (liver, muscle, and adipose tissue) , but IR‐A is predominantly expressed in the fetus and placenta, where it plays a role in embryonic development (Figure ).…”
Section: Endothelial L‐arginine/no Pathwaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, an imbalance between the p42/ 44 mapk and Akt signaling pathways could lead to preferential mitogenic or metabolic phenotypes, respectively ( Figure 3). Up to now, two isoforms of the insulin receptor have been described, that is, IR-A and B (IR-B) [7,27,33,35,[75][76][77][78]87,89]. Both isoforms are expressed in insulin-sensitive tissues (liver, muscle, and adipose tissue) [57,59], but IR-A is predominantly expressed in the fetus and placenta, where it plays a role in embryonic development [33] (Figure 3).…”
Section: Role Of Insulinmentioning
confidence: 99%