2015
DOI: 10.1080/03605302.2014.979998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Formulation and Uniqueness for Scalar Conservation Laws with Discontinuous Flux

Abstract: Abstract. We prove a uniqueness result for BV solutions of scalar conservation laws with discontinuous flux in several space dimensions. The proof is based on the notion of kinetic solution and on a careful analysis of the entropy dissipation along the discontinuities of the flux.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years there have been many works on hyperbolic conservation laws with a spatially discontinuous flux function, providing a great number of results relating to existence, uniqueness, stability, and numerical approximations of entropy solutions [1,2,3,4,5,3,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,34,36,37,38,39,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Herein we are interested in numerical methods for the initial value problem u t + F(x, u) x = 0 for (x, t) ∈ Π T := R × (0, T ), u(x, 0) = u 0 (x) for x ∈ R, (1.1) F(x, u) := H(−x)g(u) + H(x)f (u), where H(x) is the Heaviside function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years there have been many works on hyperbolic conservation laws with a spatially discontinuous flux function, providing a great number of results relating to existence, uniqueness, stability, and numerical approximations of entropy solutions [1,2,3,4,5,3,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,34,36,37,38,39,41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Herein we are interested in numerical methods for the initial value problem u t + F(x, u) x = 0 for (x, t) ∈ Π T := R × (0, T ), u(x, 0) = u 0 (x) for x ∈ R, (1.1) F(x, u) := H(−x)g(u) + H(x)f (u), where H(x) is the Heaviside function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the first statement of Lemma 2 is proved combining (15) and (16). The result for non classical shocks holds because of the flux conservation through the discontinuities z i .…”
Section: Proposition 2 Under Assumptions (H-0) (H-1) (H-2)mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Other formulation can also be found in the litterature, for instance in [16] [17] where the authors introduce an entropy criterion based on the two criteria mentioned here and obtain uniqueness (but not existence) of BV entropy solutions. We provide here some examples to compare the two formulations.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Two Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sum up, in [19] we have established another intrinsic characterization of vanishing viscosity limits which, in contrast to (VV.c), is applicable to fluxes which crossing is not restricted: (VV.c ) the characterization by singular Kruzhkov entropy inequalities of the kind (19), see [19] (see also [42]). …”
Section: Singular Values and Singular Kruzhkov Entropy Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [42], it was proved that BV solutions satisfying inequalities of the kind (20) are unique for a quite general flux function f with SBV dependence in (t, x), SBV being the special class of functions of bounded variation lacking the Cantor part. Existence of such solution is an open question.…”
Section: Existence For the Multi-dimensional Case: Adapted Viscositiesmentioning
confidence: 99%