2005
DOI: 10.1002/pssb.200440092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Ising model in two and three dimensions with constraints

Abstract: We present the dynamics of the kinetically constrained Ising model, comprised of a system of spins coupled with the strength J and situated in a field which plays the role of activation energy. Due to kinetic constraints, glassy effects arise at low temperatures leading to a non-Arrhenius α -relaxation time. The results of Monte Carlo simulations are presented for the 2D and 3D facilitated kinetic Ising model with nonzero coupling J. The spin autocorrelation function exhibits, in a broad intermediate time regi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By construction, the equilibrium state of these models is trivial. However their dynamics are cooperatively slow and they exhibit many hallmarks of glassy systems, such as dynamical heterogeneities [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], nonexponential relaxation [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and ageing [21][22][23], and in certain situations may exhibit an ergodicity-breaking jamming transition, beyond which a finite fraction of the particles are permanently frozen [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By construction, the equilibrium state of these models is trivial. However their dynamics are cooperatively slow and they exhibit many hallmarks of glassy systems, such as dynamical heterogeneities [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], nonexponential relaxation [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and ageing [21][22][23], and in certain situations may exhibit an ergodicity-breaking jamming transition, beyond which a finite fraction of the particles are permanently frozen [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most previous works regarding the FA and KA models, the relaxation time was measured by the two-time density autocorrelation function [34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. In this paper we use the persistence function, defined as the fraction of particles that have not yet moved until time t (in lattice-gas models) or the fraction of sites that have not changed state until time t (in spin-facilitated models).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%