1992
DOI: 10.1016/0301-4622(92)80045-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic model for membrane transport. III. Solute transport through an asymmetrical membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This asymmetry in the membrane transport process is discussed in detail by Makino et al, and Kocherginsky and Zhang, with the development of mathematical models. 56,57 The presence of a solubilizing agent would lead to enhanced partitioning of the drug into the receiver compartment, as well as an almost negligible free drug concentration in the receiver, further enhancing the concentration gradient. The asymmetry will also change the membrane selectivity as the overall partitioning coefficient is no longer K (k 1 =k 2 Þ, but rather logarithmic mean of K d (on the donor) and K r (on the receiver).…”
Section: Influence Of Receiver Sink On Mass Flow Rate Of Supersaturat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This asymmetry in the membrane transport process is discussed in detail by Makino et al, and Kocherginsky and Zhang, with the development of mathematical models. 56,57 The presence of a solubilizing agent would lead to enhanced partitioning of the drug into the receiver compartment, as well as an almost negligible free drug concentration in the receiver, further enhancing the concentration gradient. The asymmetry will also change the membrane selectivity as the overall partitioning coefficient is no longer K (k 1 =k 2 Þ, but rather logarithmic mean of K d (on the donor) and K r (on the receiver).…”
Section: Influence Of Receiver Sink On Mass Flow Rate Of Supersaturat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high experimental errors obtained (Figure A) as well as contradicting results seen at different stirring rates for atazanavir, we performed mass transport simulations using the Makino model , to assess the impact of different receiver solubilization capacity on the particle drifting effect. The results are shown in Figure and Figure S3 (Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinetic model developed by Makino et al 51 ( Figure S1 ) was used to analyze the impact of membrane asymmetry on the particle drifting effect. Calculation details and results are provided in the Supporting Information .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tissue-based models, including intestinal sacs, Ussing chamber, and in situ perfusion experiments, most closely mimic the in vivo permeation and absorption process. However, the extent of flux enhancement by drug nanoparticles is dependent on factors such as membrane hydrophobicity and membrane asymmetry (media composition), , which may differ greatly among different models. , Currently, little is known about the impact of model selection on flux enhancement by drug particles, and whether artificial membranes and cell monolayers are appropriate models in place of biological tissues in the evaluation of the particle drifting effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%