2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic modelling of the uranium biosorption by Deinococcus radiodurans biofilm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparable amounts of Mg²⁺ and K⁺ adsorbed by both intact and autoclaved biofilms underscore the resilience of the biofilm structure and its capacity to function as a biosorbent even after undergoing thermal treatment. This finding suggests that while autoclaving effectively eliminates live microbial components, it does not significantly alter the biofilm's ability to bind ions [Manobala et al, 2021]. The preservation of ion-binding active sites within the biofilm matrix and microbial cell walls post-autoclaving contributes to the sustained biosorption capabilities observed in autoclaved biofilms.…”
Section: Adsorption Abilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The comparable amounts of Mg²⁺ and K⁺ adsorbed by both intact and autoclaved biofilms underscore the resilience of the biofilm structure and its capacity to function as a biosorbent even after undergoing thermal treatment. This finding suggests that while autoclaving effectively eliminates live microbial components, it does not significantly alter the biofilm's ability to bind ions [Manobala et al, 2021]. The preservation of ion-binding active sites within the biofilm matrix and microbial cell walls post-autoclaving contributes to the sustained biosorption capabilities observed in autoclaved biofilms.…”
Section: Adsorption Abilitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The third stage was the final equilibrium adsorption. When the biosorbent exterior surface reached saturation, the metal ions entered the pore within the biomass particle and were adsorbed by the interior surface of the particle [36]. Comparing the intraparticle diffusion rate constants, it was obvious that kp1 (first stage) >kp2 (second stage) >kp3 (third stage).…”
Section: Intraparticle Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Q t is the adsorbed quantity (mg/g) at time t, and K id (mg/g × t 0.5 ) is the rate constant [49]. The intra-particle diffusion model parameters are provided in Table 9, according to the linear plots of Q t vs. t 0.5 .…”
Section: The Intra-particle Diffusion Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%