2014
DOI: 10.1080/13647830.2013.872300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic parameters, collision rates, energy exchanges and transport coefficients of non-thermal electrons in premixed flames at sub-breakdown electric field strengths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of non-thermal electron transport properties in methane-air flames suggests a breakdown threshold of 140 Td [39]. Since the reduced electric field strength does not exceed this threshold in the configurations considered in our work, electrons are assumed to be thermal.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analysis of non-thermal electron transport properties in methane-air flames suggests a breakdown threshold of 140 Td [39]. Since the reduced electric field strength does not exceed this threshold in the configurations considered in our work, electrons are assumed to be thermal.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[23] In Fig. B.4, the model is evaluated against experimental CH concentration profiles for low-pressure (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40), premixed, laminar CH 4 /O 2 flames diluted with N 2 . The flames were modeled as burner stabilized flames using temperature profiles measured experimentally.…”
Section: Appendix a Reaction Mechanism Of Charged Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neglecting anions is not expected to have any adverse effects in the case of voltage polarities resulting in electrons moving from the reaction zone into the burnt region. The model does not involve impact ionization reactions since the induced electric field (E/N), even at saturation, is considerably below breakdown limit [4,6,19].…”
Section: Configuration Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying P −1 to any vector v requires the application of the successive matrices of Eq. (41) to v. In its classical Schur factorization form (41), this entails four MG solves (three solves of (∆tD f − I) −1 and one of S ). To save one MG solve, the block factorization (41) is rewritten in the following form:…”
Section: Non-linear Implicit Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%