2023
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c08451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic Referencing Allows Identification of Epigenetic Cytosine Modifications by Single-Molecule Hybridization Kinetics and Superresolution DNA-PAINT Microscopy

Julian Bauer,
Andreas Reichl,
Philip Tinnefeld

Abstract: We develop a DNA origami-based internal kinetic referencing system with a colocalized reference and target molecule to provide increased sensitivity and robustness for transient binding kinetics. To showcase this, we investigate the subtle changes in binding strength of DNA oligonucleotide hybrids induced by cytosine modifications. These cytosine modifications, especially 5-methylcytosine but also its oxidized derivatives, have been increasingly studied in the context of epigenetics. Recently revealed correlat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 45 publications
(88 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, secKoned samples offer the addiKonal advantage of being more accessible to the imaging buffer and, thus, binding of imager strands. The perpetual nature of repeated imager binding at controllable rates is a hallmark of DNA-PAINT and has led to a diverse range of quanKtaKve in vitro 12,[28][29][30][31] and in situ 11,28 applicaKons, such as the counKng of target molecules within fixed cells and Kssues via qPAINT 11 . A physically-secKoned sample that is openly accessible to the imaging soluKon could potenKally exhibit improved binding kineKcs, thus elevaKng our ability to leverage DNA-PAINT as a quanKtaKve tool.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, secKoned samples offer the addiKonal advantage of being more accessible to the imaging buffer and, thus, binding of imager strands. The perpetual nature of repeated imager binding at controllable rates is a hallmark of DNA-PAINT and has led to a diverse range of quanKtaKve in vitro 12,[28][29][30][31] and in situ 11,28 applicaKons, such as the counKng of target molecules within fixed cells and Kssues via qPAINT 11 . A physically-secKoned sample that is openly accessible to the imaging soluKon could potenKally exhibit improved binding kineKcs, thus elevaKng our ability to leverage DNA-PAINT as a quanKtaKve tool.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%