2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-013-1735-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic regulation of the binding of prothrombin to phospholipid membranes

Abstract: A wide range of equilibrium and kinetic constants exist for the interaction of prothrombin and other coagulation factors with various model membranes from a variety of techniques. We have investigated the interaction of prothrombin with pure dioleoylphosphatidylcholine (DOPC) membranes and dioleoylphosphatidlyserine (DOPS)-containing membranes (DOPC:DOPS, 3:1) using surface plasmon resonance (SPR, with four different model membrane presentations) in addition to isotheral titration calorimetry (ITC, with suspen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of the FLAG‐tagged rCEA N module to bind directly to immobilized Fn, rCEA N and A 3 domains, in a dose dependent manner led to the derivation (Figures 2, 3 and 6) of dissociation constants from ELISA‐based binding curves (Figure 7) using established protocols (Sato et al., 2009; Smith et al., 2013; Jardim et al., 2000). The calculated ratios of bound to free FLAG‐tagged rCEA N module with individual monomeric components revealed that N‐to‐N, N‐to‐A 3 and N‐to‐Fn interactions to be of moderate to high affinity with K D values of 100 ± 17 nM, 18 ± 3 nM and 16 ± 3 nM for the binding of FLAG‐tagged rCEA N to immobilized rCEA N, rCEA A 3 and Fn, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ability of the FLAG‐tagged rCEA N module to bind directly to immobilized Fn, rCEA N and A 3 domains, in a dose dependent manner led to the derivation (Figures 2, 3 and 6) of dissociation constants from ELISA‐based binding curves (Figure 7) using established protocols (Sato et al., 2009; Smith et al., 2013; Jardim et al., 2000). The calculated ratios of bound to free FLAG‐tagged rCEA N module with individual monomeric components revealed that N‐to‐N, N‐to‐A 3 and N‐to‐Fn interactions to be of moderate to high affinity with K D values of 100 ± 17 nM, 18 ± 3 nM and 16 ± 3 nM for the binding of FLAG‐tagged rCEA N to immobilized rCEA N, rCEA A 3 and Fn, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equilibrium dissociation constants for the CEA N domain interaction with itself, the A 3 domain and with Fn were derived by ELISA as previously described (Sato et al., 2009; Smith et al., 2013; Jardim et al., 2000). Briefly, increasing concentrations of FLAG‐tagged rCEA N were added to multi‐well plates coated with 1 μg of either Fn, rCEA N or rCEA A 3 domains.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are nine conserved γ-carboxyglutamic acid residues, and the additional γ-carboxyglutamic acid at position 32 has been shown to be dispensable for prothrombin activation by the prothrombinase complex yet required for binding to phospholipids (32). Residue 32 has been implied for high-affinity binding and interspecies differences among naturally occurring vitamin K-dependent proteins S, Z, and C (33) and explains the peculiar kinetics of prothrombin binding to membranes (34). The Gla domain of ProTΔ146-167 and its linker connection to kringle-1 are clearly detected from A1 to N64 with four helices spanning residues N12-T21 (helix 1), S23-L31 (helix 2), T37-A50 (helix 3), P53-G63 (helix 4), and the hydrophobic ω-loop (F4-L5-V8) primed for membrane binding.…”
Section: Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be a result of high cross-reactivity between platelet membrane and PARs for binding with MT. Affinity of FII to PL (Kd = 20 -160 nM depending on membrane composition [28]- [30]) is comparable with affinity of FIIa to PARs (Kd = 11 -16 nM and 2.9 -4.6 μM depending on receptor type [31] [32]). But FIIa binds to PAR by both active site and exosite I [23] [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%