1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01979740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetic study of surface nucleated MgO-CaO-Al2O3-SiO2 glasses

Abstract: The paper investigated, by means of thermal analysis measurements, the validity of three different methods for the evaluation of the activation energy of crystallization for surface nucleated glasses belonging to the MgO--CaO-AI203-SiO2 system, separating anorthite and diopside crystals. The values obtained from Kissinger equation of the activation energy for crystallization are comparable with those obtained by other authors for similar glassy systems, 90 to 150 keal/mol. The results of the kinetic analysis u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as the activation energies are concerned, it can be said that they are fairly homogeneous, ranging from 166 to 190 and from 209 to 234kcalmo1-1 (1 kcal = 4.187 kJ) depending on the method, and the values differ slightly from the literature data. These energies, evaluated at 760-900 °C, are higher than those found at about 950-1000 °C for crystallization [15]. It can be assumed that, at the crystallization temperature, the activation energy for viscous flow is reduced in accordance with the fact that the plot of log r/versus 104/T is not a straight line The presence of crystallinity was checked by X-ray powder diffraction and a line drawn among amorphous and crystallized samples, according to Uhlmann and Kreidl [16].…”
Section: A = a E B = C B E T 2 T O = Tcontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…As far as the activation energies are concerned, it can be said that they are fairly homogeneous, ranging from 166 to 190 and from 209 to 234kcalmo1-1 (1 kcal = 4.187 kJ) depending on the method, and the values differ slightly from the literature data. These energies, evaluated at 760-900 °C, are higher than those found at about 950-1000 °C for crystallization [15]. It can be assumed that, at the crystallization temperature, the activation energy for viscous flow is reduced in accordance with the fact that the plot of log r/versus 104/T is not a straight line The presence of crystallinity was checked by X-ray powder diffraction and a line drawn among amorphous and crystallized samples, according to Uhlmann and Kreidl [16].…”
Section: A = a E B = C B E T 2 T O = Tcontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…This was also confirmed by previous studies, which noted a value of 773 kJ/mol for the free iron oxide base composition. 11,12 In this case, iron oxide lowers glass viscosity (evident in DTA as a decrease in the glass transition temperature), and consequently increases the crystal growth rate, which is also at lower crystallization temperatures. 7 In fact, according to previous work, 10 the base glass presents an activation energy for viscous flow (794 kJ/mol), similar to the crystallization one, that is almost comparable to that of pyroxene crystals (752 kJ/mol).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the DTA data, a T g (glass transition temperature)/T m (melting temperature) ratio Ͼ 0.6 was calculated (namely, a range of ϳ0.62-0.66) indicating a heterogeneous nucleation and surface mechanism of crystallization. 22 23 and Barbieri et al, 24 the activation energy for the crystallization of the glasses was evaluated by applying the derivative method (Fig. 2(c)) to the single nonisothermal DTA run at the heating rate of 10°C/min.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%