1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1990.tb08847.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics and Block of Dopamine Uptake in Synaptosomes from Rat Caudate Nucleus

Abstract: The dopamine (DA) uptake system in mammalian nerve terminals was studied by measuring the unidirectional influx of tritiated DA into synaptosomes prepared from rat caudate nucleus. Two distinct time-dependent components of DA uptake were observed. The principal component was saturable with respect to DA concentration, required both external Na and Cl, and was competitively blocked by micromolar concentrations of the psychotropic agents cocaine, benztropine, nomifensine, amphetamine, and methamphetamine. This p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
96
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
15
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Hill coefficient of ϳ2 is consistent with an apparent stoichiometry of 2 Na ϩ :1 tyrosine for coupled uptake. This is in line with much functional data in other NSSs, such as the Hill coefficient of 2 for sodium in dopamine transport by DAT (3,50) as well as the identification of two bound Na ϩ ions in the crystal structure of LeuT (21). In this structure, the carboxyl oxygen of the substrate, leucine, forms an ion pair with one Na ϩ (Na1).…”
Section: Table 1 Tyrosine Kinetics Of Tyt1 Variantssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The Hill coefficient of ϳ2 is consistent with an apparent stoichiometry of 2 Na ϩ :1 tyrosine for coupled uptake. This is in line with much functional data in other NSSs, such as the Hill coefficient of 2 for sodium in dopamine transport by DAT (3,50) as well as the identification of two bound Na ϩ ions in the crystal structure of LeuT (21). In this structure, the carboxyl oxygen of the substrate, leucine, forms an ion pair with one Na ϩ (Na1).…”
Section: Table 1 Tyrosine Kinetics Of Tyt1 Variantssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Unlike the standard exchange diffusion model of reverse transport, weak base-mediated reverse transport does not require that the transporter act as a mobile carrier. Under normal conditions cytoplasmic DA is probably much higher than extracellular DA with the transmembrane sodium and/or chloride gradient favoring uptake over release (Krueger, 1990). We suggest that amphetamine decreases the accumulation of vesicular DA, thereby increasing cytoplasmic DA sufficiently to promote net efflux.…”
Section: Uptake Blocker Inhibition Of Weak Base-mediated Da Releasementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Triethanolamine, due to its hydrophilicity, does not reach intracellular sites and thus does not effectively disrupt intracellular proton gradients (Okhuma and Poole, 198 1). Monensin, a monovalent cationic ionophore frequently used as a protonophore in whole cells, also promotes sodium flux and may therefore potentiate reverse transport by attenuating both the proton gradient required for vesicular accumulation and the sodium gradient used to drive DA uptake by the plasma membrane transporter (Kuhn et al, 1986;Krueger, 1990;Lonart and Zigmond, 1991). Nevertheless, monensin is unlikely to completely disrupt intracellular pH gradients under these conditions, which probably accounts for its reduced toxicity compared with obligatory protonophores such as p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone carbonyl cyanide (FCCP), which abolish the mitochondria1 proton gradient and uncouple oxidative phosphorylation.…”
Section: Release Of Da By Compounds That Perturb Intracellular Protonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When pharmacological agents were used, the change in the current vs. time profile was evaluated as a change in apparent K m ; inhibition of DA or 5-HT uptake was reflected as an increase in apparent K m (John et al, 2006;Jones et al, 1995a). The drugs studied have previously been described to competitively inhibit monoamine transport Davies et al, 1993;Jones et al, 1995b;Krueger, 1990;Missale et al, 1985;Richelson and Pfenning, 1984;Schuldiner et al, 1993;Wu et al, 2001a; but see, e.g., Coyle and Snyder, 1969;Eshleman et al, 1999;McElvain and Schenk, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%