The carbonate formation and decomposition (CO 3 T CO 2 + O a ) reaction on gold is important from the point of view of lowtemperature CO oxidation. Carbonate formation has been proposed as a possible reaction intermediate in CO oxidation in several investigations of supported and unsupported gold clusters. [1][2][3][4] Therefore, an understanding of this reaction on Au(111) may provide additional insight. Carbonate formation and decomposition went undetected in previous studies on Au (110) 5 and Au(111). 6 However, a surface carbonate was readily formed when oxygen precovered Ag(110) was exposed to CO 2 at 300 K. [7][8][9][10] This surface carbonate decomposes to produce CO 2 at 485 K and the remaining oxygen atoms recombinatively desorbed at 590 K. [7][8][9][10] Owing to its similarity with silver, we would anticipate equally facile carbonate formation and decomposition reactions on gold. Similar reactions have also been reported on other surfaces. [11][12][13] Here we present experimental evidence with supporting density functional theory (DFT) calculations of carbonate formation and decomposition from the adsorption of oxygen-labeled carbon dioxide (C 18 O 2 ) on an atomic oxygen ( 16 O) precovered Au(111) surface. We studied the effects of CO 2 exposure, surface temperature, and oxygen coverage on carbonate formation and decomposition and also estimated reaction probabilities (∼10 -3 -10 -4 ) and activation energies as a function of conditions.Our experiments were performed in a UHV chamber that has been described elsewhere, [14][15][16][17][18][19] but details specific to this study are briefly summarized here. The Au(111) single crystal sample is mounted to a tantalum plate that can be resistively heated and is in thermal contact with a liquid nitrogen bath. Oxygen ( 16 O) atoms were deposited using a radio frequency (RF) plasma-jet source. 16 O but with no exposure to C 18 O 2 (due to natural isotopic abundance of 18 O). As expected, no surface-bound oxygen was lost during carbonate formation and decomposition, in agreement with previous studies. [8][9][10] Figure 1b shows the amount of mass 34 produced (from the spectra in Figure 1a) as a function of C 18 O 2 exposure.To further examine the role of preadsorbed atomic oxygen on carbonate formation, we varied the oxygen precoverage (0.18-2.1 ML) while keeping both C 18 O 2 exposure (30 L) and surface temperature (167 K) constant (Figure 2). Mass 34 production increases with increasing 16 O a coverage, likely because more reactive oxygen is accessible to C 18 O 2 on the surface. Similar results were obtained employing surface temperatures of 220 and 300 K. We estimated the reaction probability of carbonate formation assuming a statistical distribution 7 in the decomposition of the surface-bound carbonate 16 OC 18 O 2 and obtained values of ∼10 -3 -10 -4 (uncertainties of (50%). These small values are likely part of the reason why an earlier study on Au(111) 6 reported undetectable surface carbonate formation. An Arrhenius plot of the reaction probabili...