1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1409(199807/10)2:4/5<397::aid-jpp100>3.0.co;2-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics and Mechanism of the Reaction of Mercury(II) with a Water-soluble Octabromoporphyrin

Abstract: The reaction of mercury(II) hydroxide with 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octabromo-5,10,15,20-tetrakis(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin, [Formula: see text]( H 2P4−), to form the mercury(II) porphyrin [( TPPSBr 8) Hg ]4−( HgP 4−) was investigated in the pH range 6.2-8.5. The observed rate constant was first-order with respect to the mercury(II) concentration and decreased with increasing pH from pH 6.2 to 7.5 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, in sterically hindered coordinating solvents (2,6-lutidine and 2,4,6-collidine), the spectral features (Table 1) were not significantly different from those observed in non-coordinating solvents. The analysis of the plot of the ʻBʼ energy versus the solvent empirical E T (30) parameter fails to show any significant differences in correlation for Cu(II) perhaloporphyrins with that of CuTPP complex. Apart from the red-shift of the electronic absorption bands of Cu(II) perhaloporphyrins in coordinating solvents, the relative intensity of the Q bands (ε Q(0,0) / ε Q(1,0) ) showed an interesting solvent dependence.…”
Section: Cu(ii) Perhaloporphyrinsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Interestingly, in sterically hindered coordinating solvents (2,6-lutidine and 2,4,6-collidine), the spectral features (Table 1) were not significantly different from those observed in non-coordinating solvents. The analysis of the plot of the ʻBʼ energy versus the solvent empirical E T (30) parameter fails to show any significant differences in correlation for Cu(II) perhaloporphyrins with that of CuTPP complex. Apart from the red-shift of the electronic absorption bands of Cu(II) perhaloporphyrins in coordinating solvents, the relative intensity of the Q bands (ε Q(0,0) / ε Q(1,0) ) showed an interesting solvent dependence.…”
Section: Cu(ii) Perhaloporphyrinsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…18 In most papers on mercury(II) [tetrakis-(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin] complexes, a species displaying a Soret-band at about 435 nm was discussed, but its composition has not been unambiguously determined; metal-to-porphyrin ratios of 2:1 24,26,89,126,129-131 and 3:2 128 have been proposed. Nahar and Tabata 131 proved that the 2:1 complex, if at all, could exist only in the narrow pH range of 2.5-4.Trimercury(II)-bisporphyrinswerewellknownbeforehand, 35,36 especially in the case of tetraphenyl-porphyrins. 132 Adeyemo and Krishnamurthy spectrophotometrically investigated the equilibrium in aqueous solution and found a species that they first considered as Hg 2 P 4-.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most papers on mercury(II) [tetrakis-(4-sulfonatophenyl)porphyrin] complexes, a species displaying a Soret-band at about 435 nm was discussed, but its composition has not been unambiguously determined; metal-to-porphyrin ratios of 2:1 ,,,, and 3:2 have been proposed. Nahar and Tabata proved that the 2:1 complex, if at all, could exist only in the narrow pH range of 2.5−4. Trimercury(II)-bisporphyrins were well known beforehand, , especially in the case of tetraphenyl-porphyrins .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, fluorimetric/colorimetric sensors have the advantage of allowing simple on-site real-time detection for specific metal ions. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] A few fluorimetric-colorimetric sensors with dual signaling have been reported for mercury, but most of them are not selective and suffer from interference by other metal ions. Furthermore, chemosensors have been reported in ''homogenious system'' as solution state, which is not recyclable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%