Two conventionally solidified Al-0.2Ti alloys (with 0.18 and 0.22 at. pct Ti) exhibit no hardening after aging up to 3200 hours at 375°C or 425°C. This is due to the absence of Al 3 Ti precipitation, as confirmed by electron microscopy and electrical conductivity measurements. By contrast, an Al-0.2Zr alloy (with 0.19 at. pct Zr) displays strong age hardening at both temperatures due to precipitation of Al 3 Zr (L1 2 ) within Zr-enriched dendritic regions. This discrepancy between the two alloys is explained within the context of the equilibrium phase diagrams: (1) the disparity in solid and liquid solubilities of Ti in a-Al is much greater than that of Zr in a-Al; and (2) the relatively small liquid solubility of Ti in a-Al limits the amount of solute retained in solid solution during solidification, while the comparatively high solid solubility reduces the supersaturation effecting precipitation during post-solidification aging. The lattice parameter mismatch of Al 3 Ti (L1 2 ) with a-Al is also larger than that of Al 3 Zr (L1 2 ), further hindering nucleation of Al 3 Ti. Classical nucleation theory indicates that the minimum solute supersaturation required to overcome the elastic strain energy of Al 3 Ti nuclei cannot be obtained during conventional solidification of Al-Ti alloys (unlike for Al-Zr alloys), thus explaining the absence of Al 3 Ti precipitation and the presence of Al 3 Zr precipitation.