2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-011-0546-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics Modeling of Mass Transfer Using Peleg’s Equation During Osmotic Dehydration of Seedless Guava (Psidium guajava L.): Effect of Process Parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar value ranges were found for osmotically dehydrated guava and apricot by Ganjloo et al . () and Khoyi & Hesari () in sucrose solutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar value ranges were found for osmotically dehydrated guava and apricot by Ganjloo et al . () and Khoyi & Hesari () in sucrose solutions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similar results were reported by Azoubel and Xidieh Murr () on tomato, Ganjloo et al . () on guava, Aminzadeh et al . () on melon, Manafi et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ganjloo et al . () obtained R 2 rates of Azuara modeling on seedless guava cubes as 0.98 and 0.95 for water loss and solids gain indices, respectively. Kaur and Singh () acquired R 2 rates of 0.98 and 0.95 for water loss and solids gain indices of Azuara modeling on beetroot, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The goodness of fit of the mathematical models to the experimental data was evaluated with the coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), sum of squared error (SSE), root mean square error (RMSE), chi‐square (χ 2 ) and mean relative percent deviation ( P ) (Corzo and Bracho ; Togrul and Ispir ; Ganjloo et al . ). These parameters can be calculated as follows: R 2 = 1 i = 1 N ( X exp , i X pre , i ) 2 i = 1 N ( X exp , i true X ̅ exp ) 2 S S E = 1 N i = 1 N ( X exp , i X pre , i ) 2 R M S E = 1 N i = 1 N ( X exp , i X pre , i ) 2 χ 2 = i = 1 N ( X exp , i X pre , i ) 2 N n …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%