1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01443736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of cluster growth by aggregation

Abstract: Abstract. The classical problem of the coalescence of isolated species to produce growing clusters/colloids/polymers by successive statistical encounters having the same rate constant, is revisited using numerical simulation for a maximum nuclearity value of a few 10 3 units. The evolution with time of the abundance of clusters of a given nuclearity and of the total population, and the distribution of sizes at a given time are obtained and compared with models from the literature. A remarkable feature of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The critical induction time, t c , depends strongly on the initial atom concentration, fixed by the dose per pulse, on the coalescence rate constant and on the critical nuclearity selected by the donor potential. At variable doses and at a given ratio [Ag(CN) 2 -] 0 /[MV 2+ ] 0 ) 1, yielding a constant initial ratio of silver atoms and donor molecules according to the scavenging competition for e aq -and radicals, it is observed (Figure 4) that t c -1 depends linearly in the range of uncertainty of measurements on the initial total absorbance at 700 nm (which is proportional to the dose), as has already been found in the kinetics model 1,24 and experimentally in the silver sulfate 1 or polyacrylate 4 systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The critical induction time, t c , depends strongly on the initial atom concentration, fixed by the dose per pulse, on the coalescence rate constant and on the critical nuclearity selected by the donor potential. At variable doses and at a given ratio [Ag(CN) 2 -] 0 /[MV 2+ ] 0 ) 1, yielding a constant initial ratio of silver atoms and donor molecules according to the scavenging competition for e aq -and radicals, it is observed (Figure 4) that t c -1 depends linearly in the range of uncertainty of measurements on the initial total absorbance at 700 nm (which is proportional to the dose), as has already been found in the kinetics model 1,24 and experimentally in the silver sulfate 1 or polyacrylate 4 systems.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…21 Also, as in the latter case, the coalescence rate constant k d between two clusters may be supposed independent of the nuclearity n. Thus, the k d value can be derived from results on the growth process kinetics. In fact, from the general model of growth kinetics 1,24 resulting from all coalescence reactions between two clusters of any size, it was stated that the kinetics should be superimposed, provided the total cluster concentration Σx n is normalized relative to the initial concentration of atoms x 0 ) [Ag] t)0 as Σx n /x 0 and the time is expressed as t/τ with τ ) 1/k d x 0 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is a much more complex system than in the previous study in free solution (Mostafavi et al, 1989;Sahyun et al, 1993;Khatouri et al, 1993Khatouri et al, , 1995a because it is twice microheterogeneous: first the silver ions belong to insoluble AgCl crystallites and second, after reduction, the silver atoms are clustering at the surface of these crystallites. The interest is to study how the environment is affecting the redox potentials and the kinetics processes compared to the previous study in free solution (Mostafavi et al, 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The rate constant values of some of the above reactions in a homogeneous aqueous phase (k w ) are known from the literature (Buxton et al, 1988;Khatouri et al, 1993Khatouri et al, , 1995a: k 8;w ¼ 8:4 Â 10 10 M À1 s À1 ; k 10;w ¼ 5:5 Â 10 9 M À1 s À1 ; k 11;w ¼ 2:3 Â 10 10 M À1 s À1 ; k 13;w ¼ 3:5 Â 10 9 M À1 s À1 ;…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%