2011
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2011-01509-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of colloidal fractal aggregation by differential dynamic microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…15 From DDM, it is possible to obtain the same dynamical correlation function measured in dynamic light scattering as a function of wave vector (q) space in systems that are not compatible with DLS, and using smaller sample volumes. Since its original development, DDM has been successfully used to measure particle diffusivity, 16 particle velocity, 17 colloidal aggregation and gelation kinetics, 18,19 bacterial motility, [20][21][22][23] hydrodynamic factors in concentrated colloidal dispersions, 21 viscoelasticity of liquid crystals, 24 and anisotropic particle motion. 25 It has also been adapted for use in texture analysis microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15 From DDM, it is possible to obtain the same dynamical correlation function measured in dynamic light scattering as a function of wave vector (q) space in systems that are not compatible with DLS, and using smaller sample volumes. Since its original development, DDM has been successfully used to measure particle diffusivity, 16 particle velocity, 17 colloidal aggregation and gelation kinetics, 18,19 bacterial motility, [20][21][22][23] hydrodynamic factors in concentrated colloidal dispersions, 21 viscoelasticity of liquid crystals, 24 and anisotropic particle motion. 25 It has also been adapted for use in texture analysis microscopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, differential dynamic analysis has been successfully applied to bright-field, [16][17][18][19]22,28 fluorescence, 16 confocal, 21 , polarised, 24 and phase-contrast 20,23,25 forms of microscopy. One widely used imaging mode that is not included in this list is darkfield microscopy, the illumination system for which is depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DDM has two key advantages: first, it yields measurements of the dynamics of particles whose size is smaller than the optical resolution limit [18,19]; second, its simplest implementation requires only a standard optical microscope, incoherent (white light) illumination, and a digital video camera, although extensions to fluorescence [19] and confocal [20] microscopy add specificity and resolution. As a result, this method has been used to characterize the dynamics of monodisperse spherical [21] and anisotropic [22][23][24] nanoparticles and bacteria [25][26][27] in complex geometries [28,29]. Despite these achievements, two factors currently limit the use of DDM for nanoscale biological particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first notable feature of DDM is that it can be implemented with a variety of imaging contrast mechanisms that can operate in various conditions of signal-to-noise ratio, resolution needs and multiple scattering. Since its introduction about ten years ago, DDM was used to study colloids in bright-field [35][36][37][38][39][40][41], phase-contrast [42], dark-field [43,44] and depolarized [45] microscopy. It has also been demonstrated with fluorescent particles in wide-field [36,46,47], confocal [48,49] and lightsheet [50,51] configurations.…”
Section: Digital Fourier Microscopy Of Colloids: Quantitative Microscmentioning
confidence: 99%