2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.05.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of electrodialytic extraction of Pb and soil cations from a slurry of contaminated soil fines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a kinetics study on the electrodialytic removal of Al, Fe, Ca, K, Mg, Mn and Pb from an industrially polluted soil [18]; the removal of a given metal during EDR can be divided into four phases:…”
Section: Multivariate Design and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a kinetics study on the electrodialytic removal of Al, Fe, Ca, K, Mg, Mn and Pb from an industrially polluted soil [18]; the removal of a given metal during EDR can be divided into four phases:…”
Section: Multivariate Design and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is interesting to note that the least efficient removal of both heavy metals and trace elements are encountered in the 2-compartment cell (experiment 5). In this part of the experimental domain it appears that many of the heavy metals are still in the lag phase of the electrodialytic removal [36] in which there is limited removal of the given metal. The same part of the experimental domain is not covered by the 3-compartment cell experiments and no direct comparison is possible.…”
Section: Electrodialytic Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PLS model correlation factor R2Y was 0.91 and the predictive power, Q2, was 0.24. The fairly low predictive indicated too large an experimental domain, in which several electrodialytic removal phases [36] (different removal rates) were covered, or that the model included metals not behaving similarly. The model results can however be used for retrieving indicative and general trends.…”
Section: Pls Model For the 2-compartment Cellmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, extending the duration from 10 to 14 days did not have a great impact on the removal of Cd from raw ashes in the three-compartment EDR cell (experiments E1 and E3), so the remediation could be conducted in less than 10 days under the same conditions. The duration between 10 and 14 days, on the other hand, affected the removal of Cu, Pb and Zn, and the results (Table 4) imply that a longer duration can reduce the content of Pb and Cu; this has also been seen in EDR treatment of contaminated soils [27,28]. The goal of remediation, therefore, determines the duration.…”
Section: Overall Removalmentioning
confidence: 90%