2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11144-006-0117-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of gas oil catalytic cracking 

Abstract: In the present work catalytic cracking of gas oils has been studied in a standard MAT reactor. The cracking product distribution was measured at four different temperatures. Based on the experimental results, a 4-lump kinetic model was applied. Kinetic constants were estimated using the sequential step optimization method. Simulation results have shown to be in a good agreement with experimental data. An isothermal pseudo steady-state model for fixed bed MAT reactor is proposed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimated activation energies for the conversion of heavy fraction to naphtha ( E HN ) and conversion of naphtha to C 1 –C 4 gaseous products ( E NG ) were 9.89 and 15.79 kcal/mol, respectively. Reported values for the corresponding reactions during catalytic cracking of VGO were in the range of 11.7–16.2 kcal/mol and 13.6–27.0 kcal/mol, respectively. , It can be noticed that the E NG obtained in this study was within the range of activation energies reported in the literature while E HN is somewhat below the range.…”
Section: Kinetic Modelingsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The estimated activation energies for the conversion of heavy fraction to naphtha ( E HN ) and conversion of naphtha to C 1 –C 4 gaseous products ( E NG ) were 9.89 and 15.79 kcal/mol, respectively. Reported values for the corresponding reactions during catalytic cracking of VGO were in the range of 11.7–16.2 kcal/mol and 13.6–27.0 kcal/mol, respectively. , It can be noticed that the E NG obtained in this study was within the range of activation energies reported in the literature while E HN is somewhat below the range.…”
Section: Kinetic Modelingsupporting
confidence: 61%