2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-009-9989-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of Lead Bioaccumulation from a Hydroponic Medium by Aquatic Macrophytes Pistia stratiotes

Abstract: The goal of this work was to study quantitatively lead bioaccumulation from a leaddoped nutrient medium by using a living aquatic macrophytes Pistia stratiotes. Several sets of aquatic plants with approximately 30 g weight were grown in greenhouse conditions and in hydroponic solutions supplied with a non-toxic Pb 2+ concentration. The synchrotron radiation total X-ray fluorescence spectrometry was used to determine the metal concentrations in dry plants and hydroponic media as a function of time. Four differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest removal percentage at 5.0 mg l −1 was exhibited in P. stratiotes (97) followed by S. auriculata (80), A. filiculoides (78), and S. minima (70). These results correspond with the great ability of P. stratiotes, which accumulates approximately 50% of lead after 24 h (Espinoza-Quiñones et al 2009). At 10 mg l −1 the percentage removal efficiency of P. stratiotes had (95) followed by A. filiculoides (94), S. minima (89), and S. auriculata (84).…”
Section: Heavy Metal Removal Efficiency Of Different Plant Speciessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The highest removal percentage at 5.0 mg l −1 was exhibited in P. stratiotes (97) followed by S. auriculata (80), A. filiculoides (78), and S. minima (70). These results correspond with the great ability of P. stratiotes, which accumulates approximately 50% of lead after 24 h (Espinoza-Quiñones et al 2009). At 10 mg l −1 the percentage removal efficiency of P. stratiotes had (95) followed by A. filiculoides (94), S. minima (89), and S. auriculata (84).…”
Section: Heavy Metal Removal Efficiency Of Different Plant Speciessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…When toxic metals are discharged into natural waters, appropriate methods are required to remove these metal pollutants. Conventional methods including physiochemical and biological technologies have been employed to remove toxic metals from aqueous solutions [1,2]. Phytoplankton is suggested to be potential and attractive biosorbents to concentrate heavy metals due to their ubiquitous presence in aquatic ecosystems and high binding affinity to metals [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the most of these methodologies are applied in low metal concentration effluent treatments, they could have high chemical costs or low removal efficiencies, low selectivities, high-energy requirements, and generation of secondary toxic slurries [10]. A variety of mechanisms exist for the removal of heavy metals in low concentrations from aqueous solution by macrophytes [11][12][13][14][15][16], activated carbon [17], fungi [18], orange peel [19][20][21], and higher plants [22], sequestering and accumulating metallic ions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%