2013
DOI: 10.4319/lo.2013.58.3.0987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of manganese adsorption, desorption, and oxidation in coastal marine sediments

Abstract: Ejection of excavated manganese (Mn)-laden particles from anoxic subsurface sediment onto an oxic sediment-water interface by infauna and by other physical disturbances triggers desorption and oxidation of reduced manganese species. These competing reactions determine whether adsorbed Mn(II) will be desorbed and escape into the water column or be oxidized to Mn(IV) and retained as an insoluble component of the sediment. Consequently, the net flux of Mn(II) to the water column depends on the relative rates of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose that Mn(II) diffusing up from the sediment anoxic zone is responsible for the Mn(III)-L production in the suboxic porewaters, and that these complexes may be recycled to Mn(II) upon burial or oxidized to MnO x in the oxic zone. Upward diffusion of porewater Mn(II) and/or advection of Mn(II)-bearing particles by bioturbation (Richard et al, 2013) Duckworth and Sposito, 2005;Parker et al, 2007). In the St. Lawrence Estuary, particle concentrations are greater in surface waters (2.5 -2.7 mg L -1 ) than in bottom waters (1.2 -1.5 mg L -1 ; Bourgoin and Tremblay, 2010), and we predict that surface-catalyzed oxidation (eq.1) is not the dominant oxidizing mechanism at this site, particularly as our highest MnO x concentrations were measured in bottom water samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We propose that Mn(II) diffusing up from the sediment anoxic zone is responsible for the Mn(III)-L production in the suboxic porewaters, and that these complexes may be recycled to Mn(II) upon burial or oxidized to MnO x in the oxic zone. Upward diffusion of porewater Mn(II) and/or advection of Mn(II)-bearing particles by bioturbation (Richard et al, 2013) Duckworth and Sposito, 2005;Parker et al, 2007). In the St. Lawrence Estuary, particle concentrations are greater in surface waters (2.5 -2.7 mg L -1 ) than in bottom waters (1.2 -1.5 mg L -1 ; Bourgoin and Tremblay, 2010), and we predict that surface-catalyzed oxidation (eq.1) is not the dominant oxidizing mechanism at this site, particularly as our highest MnO x concentrations were measured in bottom water samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of Mn (II) oxidation is a function of the flux of dMn T out of the sediments, the nature of the ligand(s) in the water column, the abundance of particles in the water column, and the dO 2 . Mn(II) escapes from the sediments to the overlying waters at both study sites, and the appearance of Mn oxides and Mn(III)-L in bottom waters is clear evidence of Mn(II) oxidation in the water column (Sundby et al, 1981;Richard et al, 2013). (Yeats et al, 1979) Table Recovery tests of dMn T measured using a 100-cm cell coupled to a UV/Vis spectrophotometer following a heating step.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dissolved oxygen levels were above 5 mg/l throughout the year, indicating that a hypoxic event was not the source of elevated Mn at Copano East in January. Many other studies have found high spatial (Statham et al 2005) and temporal (Shiller 1997;Elsdon and Gillanders 2006) variation in dissolved Mn, which is not unexpected since Mn behavior is highly influenced by natural redox cycles and mediated by microbial activities (Thamdrup et al 1994;Pakhomova et al 2007;Richard et al 2013). …”
Section: Temporal Patternsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Mn-oxides altered pyrite, contributing to the initial precipitation of Co-and Mn-rich deposits. The latter reaction may lead to a diffusion of Mn in the sediments, which would explain the distribution of Mn around the appendages of the analyzed marrellomorph (Richard et al, 2013;Fig. 13).…”
Section: Late Diagenesis Metamorphism and Modern Weatheringmentioning
confidence: 99%