2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of peat soil dissolved organic carbon release to surface water. Part 2. A chemodynamic process model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, 1.04 ± 0.13 mg C g soil −1 was extracted from S900, representing only 1.3% of SOC. Other studies have also found a comparable yield from other soils, ranging from 0.5 to 4% [16,20]. This water extraction process, which simulates the surface runoff process, extracts the quick release fraction in the carbon bed.…”
Section: Distribution Of Organic Carbon Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, 1.04 ± 0.13 mg C g soil −1 was extracted from S900, representing only 1.3% of SOC. Other studies have also found a comparable yield from other soils, ranging from 0.5 to 4% [16,20]. This water extraction process, which simulates the surface runoff process, extracts the quick release fraction in the carbon bed.…”
Section: Distribution Of Organic Carbon Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This water extraction process, which simulates the surface runoff process, extracts the quick release fraction in the carbon bed. The release of other soil carbon fractions is a microbe-driven process and only a small portion of SOC will be released over time [20]. WEOC from forest soils at different altitudes had similar distributions in POC, COC, and DOC fractions (Fig.…”
Section: Distribution Of Organic Carbon Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First the model accounts for a labile and a recalcitrant DOC pool based on their decomposition rate Thibodeaux and Aguilar, 2005). The labile pool is readily available for decomposition in soil solution at all times and the recalcitrant pool is subject to a slower decomposition rate .…”
Section: Doc Fluxes and Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, model uncertainties were introduced by the assumption that the equilibrium between soluble OM in aqueous and solid phases can be achieved instantaneously. Experimental studies have proved that sorption/desorption processes of soluble OM in soil are more or less rate limited [Chow et al, 2006;Kaiser and Zech, 1998;Thihodeaux et al, 2004]. Several options are available for future model improvement, such as the Elovich equation and the fractional-power model [Kaiser and Zech, 1998], simple linear kinetic equation [Yurova et al, 2008] and the ''two sites'' method (One is rapid and another is rate limited) [Fan et al, 2010;Xu et al, 2012].…”
Section: Adsorption and Desorption Of Soluble Ommentioning
confidence: 99%