2015
DOI: 10.1039/c4sm02007c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of polymer looping with macromolecular crowding: effects of volume fraction and crowder size

Abstract: The looping of polymers such as DNA is a fundamental process in the molecular biology of living cells, whose interior is characterised by a high degree of molecular crowding. We here investigate in detail the looping dynamics of flexible polymer chains in the presence of different degrees of crowding. From the analysis of the looping-unlooping rates and the looping probabilities of the chain ends we show that the presence of small crowders typically slows down the chain dynamics but larger crowders may in fact… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
87
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
(267 reference statements)
9
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[27][28][29][30] From the well-established Asakura-Oosawa model (AOM) 31,32 that modelled the influence of cosolutes using steric effects (and hence ascribed the observations to predominantly entropic considerations) on the incorporation of soft repulsions/interactions, the latter bringing in the enthalpic component, several modifications and advancements have been made over the years to understand the underlying interactions more comprehensively. [27][28][29][30] From the well-established Asakura-Oosawa model (AOM) 31,32 that modelled the influence of cosolutes using steric effects (and hence ascribed the observations to predominantly entropic considerations) on the incorporation of soft repulsions/interactions, the latter bringing in the enthalpic component, several modifications and advancements have been made over the years to understand the underlying interactions more comprehensively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29][30] From the well-established Asakura-Oosawa model (AOM) 31,32 that modelled the influence of cosolutes using steric effects (and hence ascribed the observations to predominantly entropic considerations) on the incorporation of soft repulsions/interactions, the latter bringing in the enthalpic component, several modifications and advancements have been made over the years to understand the underlying interactions more comprehensively. [27][28][29][30] From the well-established Asakura-Oosawa model (AOM) 31,32 that modelled the influence of cosolutes using steric effects (and hence ascribed the observations to predominantly entropic considerations) on the incorporation of soft repulsions/interactions, the latter bringing in the enthalpic component, several modifications and advancements have been made over the years to understand the underlying interactions more comprehensively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharp 80 and other groups 81 have reported the size dependence of macromolecular crowding, concluding that generally ‘smaller is better’. In addition, other groups are developing sensors to more accurately quantify macromolecular crowding in living cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This model will account for the non-uniformly crowded cellular interior which is known to have an impact on both the diffusion coefficient and reaction rates [41][42][43][44]. We particularly wish to use this spatial model to further investigate our preliminary observations that cells that are likely to take on a soft polarization state have two-dimensional-type geometries where exchange between cytoplasmic and cortical compartments is negligible but where protein conservation plays a critical role [28,45], while hard polarization tends to occur in cells with distinct three-dimensional geometries where cytoplasmic diffusion, away from the cortex, may play a significant role such as in columnar epithelial cells or embryonic cells [6,46].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%