1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(81)80196-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of surface reactions in catalytic combustion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As with the homogeneous reactions, the heterogeneous reactions can be of any order. In combustion, the modeling of heterogeneous reactions has been discussed by Harrison and Ernst (1978), Bruno et al (1983), Fakheri and Buckius (1983), and Marteney and Kesten (1981). Here we assume the earlier simple relation holds where "'i is constant and is given apriori.…”
Section: Local Volume-averaged Mass Conservation Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As with the homogeneous reactions, the heterogeneous reactions can be of any order. In combustion, the modeling of heterogeneous reactions has been discussed by Harrison and Ernst (1978), Bruno et al (1983), Fakheri and Buckius (1983), and Marteney and Kesten (1981). Here we assume the earlier simple relation holds where "'i is constant and is given apriori.…”
Section: Local Volume-averaged Mass Conservation Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is convenient to characterize these efforts in terms of their description of the gas phase within the catalytic passage, that is, whether the channel is one-dimensional (relying on heat-and mass-transfer coefficient correlations), two-dimensional (assuming axisymmetry, parallel flat plates, or external boundary-layer flow), or three-dimensional (no spatial simplifications). These studies have included: one-dimensional considerations of single passageways (Votruba et al, 1975;Heck et al, 1976;Young and Finlayson, 1976a,b;Sinkule and HlavLcek, 1978;Finlayson and Young, 1979;Marteney and Kesten, 1981;T'ien, 1981a,b;Oh and Cavendish, 1982;Prasad et al, 1983;Ahn et al, 1986;Zygourakis, 1989;Bennet et al, 1992;Tien and T'ien, 1992;Montreuil et al, 1992;Groppi et al, 1993;O h and Bissett, 1993;Leighton and Chang, 1995), multiple passageways (Flytzani-Stephanopoulos et al, 1986;Chen et al, 1988;Kolaczkowski et al, 1988;Kolaczkowski and Worth, 19951, two-dimensional solutions for single passageways (Heck et al, 1976;Young and Finlayson, 1976a,b;Finlayson and Young, 1979;Bennet et al, 1992;Lee and Aris, 1977;Harrison and Ernst, 1978;Zygourakis and Ark, 1983;Bruno et al, 1983;Ryan et al, 1991;Hayes et al, 1992Hayes et al, , 1996Boehman et al, 1992;Hayes and Kolaczkowsi, 1994;Groppi et al, 1995;Frye and Boehman, 1996;Boehman et al, 1997a,b), exter...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Chemical reaction rate Various attempts at measuring heterogeneous reaction rates within catalytic monoliths or single tubes coated with catalyst on the inside wall have been recorded in the literature. Marteney & Kesten (1981) studied the catalytic oxidation of carbon monoxide, and Bruno et al (1983) examined the catalytic oxidation of propane in monolith type configurations. Their approach was to use a mathematical model of the reactor to deduce indirectly or confirm an assumed chemical kinetic equation relating to the heterogeneous kinetics of oxidation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%