1990
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(90)90112-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of the intermediate stage of phase transition in batch crystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…His approach only roughly describes the crystallization process because it does not take into account the ocean salinity. The account for the salt displacement by the growing ice and its diffusion in the liquid within Stefan's thermal problem slightly improves the situation (BUYEVICH et al, 2001). However, both the purely thermal and thermal diffusion model with a planar front poorly describe the data of different laboratory and field observations [see, among others, HUPPERT and WORSTER, (1985), WORSTER (1986), ALEXANDROV and MALYGIN (2006a)].…”
Section: Sea Ice Growth With a Mushy Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…His approach only roughly describes the crystallization process because it does not take into account the ocean salinity. The account for the salt displacement by the growing ice and its diffusion in the liquid within Stefan's thermal problem slightly improves the situation (BUYEVICH et al, 2001). However, both the purely thermal and thermal diffusion model with a planar front poorly describe the data of different laboratory and field observations [see, among others, HUPPERT and WORSTER, (1985), WORSTER (1986), ALEXANDROV and MALYGIN (2006a)].…”
Section: Sea Ice Growth With a Mushy Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 and 4 to study the role of stochastic fluctuations of corresponding parameters on the nonlinear dynamics of crystallization processes). The phase transition zone represents a quasi-equilibrium mushy layer (HILLS et al, 1983;BUYEVICH et al, 2001). Since a relaxation time of the temperature field is far less than characteristic times of the process (a relaxation time of the salinity field or a characteristic time of the motion of the phase transition boundary), the temperature field in the mushy layer (false bottom) is considered as a linear function of the spatial coordinate.…”
Section: Sea Ice Growth With a Mushy Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the sake of simplicity, equations and their approximate analytical solutions will be discussed further separately in each of the regions. The heat-conduction and diffusion equations in the primary mushy layer (ϕ B = ϕ C = 0) can be written in the form [1,10]:…”
Section: The Moving Boundary Problem and Its Analytical Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their rich nonlinear behavior has attracted substantial scientific interest and their ubiquity in fields ranging from metallurgy to geophysics stimulates developing new mathematical approaches (including phase-field models) (see, among others [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]). Solidification of single-component and binary solutions within the framework of the classical frontal approach as well as of the mushy layer scenario has intensively been studied by many authors for the last few years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently a mathematical procedure using the steepest descents method of integration was developed for the problem of crystallization in an isolated, initially supercooled system [Buyevich and Mansurov, 1990] …”
Section: Influence Of Kinetics On Convectionmentioning
confidence: 99%