1967
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4686(67)80064-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of the reduction of Mn2+ at the dropping mercury electrode in non-aqueous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, further extending these calculations to additional species, the computed reduction of Ni I (IB)­X to Ni 0 (IB)­X or Ni 0 (IB) is calculated to occur at exceedingly negative formal potentials (∼−3 to −4 V). These calculated potentials for Ni 0 formation are significantly more negative than the reduction potentials of typical reductants used in cross-coupling reactions (e.g., ∼−1.11 V vs Fc +/0 in DMA for tetrakis­(dimethylamino)­ethylene (TDAE) or ∼−1.94 V vs Fc +/0 in DMF for Mn 0 ). , Similarly, the disproportionation of Ni I (IB)­X to Ni II (IB)­X 2 and Ni 0 (IB) is thermodynamically highly unfavorable, with a Δ G (CPCM) of ∼+57 kcal mol –1 for both X = Cl and Br. Thus, Ni 0 is unlikely to be a catalytically relevant redox state.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, further extending these calculations to additional species, the computed reduction of Ni I (IB)­X to Ni 0 (IB)­X or Ni 0 (IB) is calculated to occur at exceedingly negative formal potentials (∼−3 to −4 V). These calculated potentials for Ni 0 formation are significantly more negative than the reduction potentials of typical reductants used in cross-coupling reactions (e.g., ∼−1.11 V vs Fc +/0 in DMA for tetrakis­(dimethylamino)­ethylene (TDAE) or ∼−1.94 V vs Fc +/0 in DMF for Mn 0 ). , Similarly, the disproportionation of Ni I (IB)­X to Ni II (IB)­X 2 and Ni 0 (IB) is thermodynamically highly unfavorable, with a Δ G (CPCM) of ∼+57 kcal mol –1 for both X = Cl and Br. Thus, Ni 0 is unlikely to be a catalytically relevant redox state.…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reactions involving electron transfers were corrected by adding the energy of Mn 0/2+ redox couple or TDAE 0/+ , which were used as the external reducing agents in refs and . Note that we have adopted values of E ° = −1.94 V vs Fc +/0 for Mn 2+/0 obtained from the experiments in refs and and E ° = −1.34 V vs Fc +/0 for TDAE +/0 from computations in this article.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases, as seen from Table 1 the value of K f decreases and irreversibility increases in acetonitrile in comparison to water. Since the value of dielectric constant of solvent is very low and again viscosity also decreases regularly, the shifts of E 1/2 to more positive values and the change of i d can be best explained on the basis of salvation and viscosity [15][16][17].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these calculations and the ligand field spectroscopy both indicate for the first time that the RAMO energy is an excellent descriptor of the redox properties of these metal-based cross-coupling catalysts, and DFT calculations provide a useful approach for analyzing ligand contributions to potentials.Finally, further extending these calculations to additional species, the computed reduction of Ni I (IB)X to Ni 0 (IB)X or Ni 0 (IB) is calculated to occur at exceedingly negative formal potentials (~-3 V to -4 V). These calculated potentials for Ni 0 formation are significantly more negative than the reduction potentials of typical reductants used in cross-coupling reactions (e.g., ~-1.11 V vs.Fc +/0 in DMA for tetrakis(dimethylamino)ethylene (TDAE) or ~-1.94 V vs Fc +/0 in DMF for Mn 0 ) 46,47. Similarly, the disproportionation of Ni I (IB)X to Ni II (IB)X2 and Ni 0 (IB) is thermodynamically highly unfavorable, with a ΔG(CPCM) of ~+57 kcal mol -1 for both X = Cl and Br.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%