1982
DOI: 10.1002/bbpc.19820860702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of the Species OH(A2Σ+), OH(X2Π and CH(X2Π) in the System C2H2/O/H

Abstract: OH*(A 2Σ+) and OH(X2Π) concentration‐time‐profiles were measured in the gas phase reaction system C2H2/O/H at 2.66 mbar and 298 K in a discharge flow system for largely varying initial conditions. The well established chemiluminescence reaction CH + O2 → OH*(A2Σ+) + CO connects the experimental OH*(A2Σ+) concentrations to the concentrations of the intermediate CH(X 2Π) which is an important precursor of higher hydrocarbons. Computer analysis showed that the reaction CH2 + H → CH + H2 is the major CH formation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The rate constant for that reaction was derived by Porter et al [18] by correlating measured CH, O 2 and OH* profiles through the flame. Walsh et al [15] reported a rate constant for the OH* formation that was two orders of magnitude greater than the one derived by Porter et al [18], although Grebe and Homann [34], in the same year, reported a rate constant approximately equal to the one derived by Porter et al [18] in their work at a flow reactor. Smith et al [23] proposed a rate constant for OH* formation three times greater than that of Porter et al [18] by measuring absolute excited concentrations of OH* at a flat premixed low-pressure methane-air flame.…”
Section: Geometry and Excited Species Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The rate constant for that reaction was derived by Porter et al [18] by correlating measured CH, O 2 and OH* profiles through the flame. Walsh et al [15] reported a rate constant for the OH* formation that was two orders of magnitude greater than the one derived by Porter et al [18], although Grebe and Homann [34], in the same year, reported a rate constant approximately equal to the one derived by Porter et al [18] in their work at a flow reactor. Smith et al [23] proposed a rate constant for OH* formation three times greater than that of Porter et al [18] by measuring absolute excited concentrations of OH* at a flat premixed low-pressure methane-air flame.…”
Section: Geometry and Excited Species Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…OH * emission from hydrogen mixtures has been studied in shock tubes by Belles and Lauver [16], Gutman et al [17], Gardiner et al [18], Hidaka et al [19], Koike and Morinaga [20], and Paul et al [21]. Measurements of OH * formation rates in hydrocarbon mixtures have been reported by Carl et al [22], Grebe and Homann [23], Lichtin et al [24,25], Smith et al [14,15], and Porter et al [26]. Theoretical studies of the collisional quenching of OH * are available as well [27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the determination of their absolute concentrations the H-atoms were converted to OH-radicals via the reaction H + NO, + OH + NO (4) by the addition of excess NO, in the absence of CH, and CH,CO. The OH-radicals which were calibrated using reaction (4) with H in excess over NO, were monitored directly with the Imr.…”
Section: Mol/cm3mentioning
confidence: 99%