2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.09.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetics of water adsorption/desorption under isobaric stages of adsorption heat transformers: The effect of isobar shape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the predicted step positions (α) of COFs in Figure 3d−f demonstrated that all high-performing COFs generally exhibited lower step positions (α ≤ 0.4) under varying working conditions, consistent with the preferential stepwise adsorption or type V isotherm from both the thermodynamic and energetic perspectives. 14,36,38,39 Specifically, COFs with 0.2 < α ≤ 0.4 are favorable for heating and cooling, whereas COFs with 0 < α ≤ 0.2 are better candidates for ice making, which is resulted from the high working capacity at defined operating conditions (Figure S6). Besides, the top-performing COFs exhibited not only the high working capacity (ΔW) and relatively low step positions but also the moderate averaged enthalpy of adsorption (−⟨ΔH ads ⟩ ∼40 kJ/mol), both of which are favorable for the COP of MOFs (Figures S7 and S8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the predicted step positions (α) of COFs in Figure 3d−f demonstrated that all high-performing COFs generally exhibited lower step positions (α ≤ 0.4) under varying working conditions, consistent with the preferential stepwise adsorption or type V isotherm from both the thermodynamic and energetic perspectives. 14,36,38,39 Specifically, COFs with 0.2 < α ≤ 0.4 are favorable for heating and cooling, whereas COFs with 0 < α ≤ 0.2 are better candidates for ice making, which is resulted from the high working capacity at defined operating conditions (Figure S6). Besides, the top-performing COFs exhibited not only the high working capacity (ΔW) and relatively low step positions but also the moderate averaged enthalpy of adsorption (−⟨ΔH ads ⟩ ∼40 kJ/mol), both of which are favorable for the COP of MOFs (Figures S7 and S8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of the type of adsorbent, material with high uptake at lower partial pressure, and having stepwise isotherm is preferred as this will give better efficiency and performance [35,36]. Furthermore, the phenomenon of hysteresis is undesired for the adsorption process as this will cause a loss of inefficiency.…”
Section: Physical Adsorbents and Desired Adsorption Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these properties, the shape of the characteristic curve has a high influence on power density: Okunev et al [70] and Glaznev et al [71] found that the concave shape of the adsorption isobars influences the sorption process and leads to a slower adsorption process than the desorption process. Aristov [72] concluded in a theoretic study that a step adsorption isobar is preferable and Okunev et al [73] refined this study by modeling the adsorption isobar with a consistent model for equilibrium, heat transfer, and diffusion.…”
Section: The Potential Of Mofsmentioning
confidence: 99%