2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.30.436326
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kinetochore life histories reveal the origins of chromosome mis-segregation and correction mechanisms

Abstract: Chromosome mis-segregation during mitosis leads to daughter cells with deviant karyotypes (aneuploidy) and an increased mutational burden through chromothripsis of mis-segregated chromosomes. The rate of mis-segregation and the aneuploidy state are hallmarks of cancer and linked to cancer genome evolution. Errors can manifest as lagging chromosomes in anaphase, although the mechanistic origins and likelihood of correction are incompletely understood. Here we combine lattice light sheet microscopy, endogenous p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 43 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 We now show that although most micronuclei derive from anaphase lagging chromosomes, simply because these events occur at a very high frequency in chromosomally unstable cancer cells, 54 misaligned chromosomes that satisfy the SAC often directly missegregate (without lagging behind in anaphase) and have the highest probability to form micronuclei, specifically in human cancer cell models (see graphical abstract). This is consistent with recent high-resolution live-cell studies in both cancer and non-cancer human cells that showed that the vast majority of lagging chromosomes have a transient nature and are corrected during anaphase by an Aurora-B-dependent mechanism that prevents micronuclei formation, 46 , 60 and the relatively low frequency of micronuclei formation even after induction of massive chromosome segregation errors by experimental abrogation of the SAC. 61 , 62 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“… 43 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 We now show that although most micronuclei derive from anaphase lagging chromosomes, simply because these events occur at a very high frequency in chromosomally unstable cancer cells, 54 misaligned chromosomes that satisfy the SAC often directly missegregate (without lagging behind in anaphase) and have the highest probability to form micronuclei, specifically in human cancer cell models (see graphical abstract). This is consistent with recent high-resolution live-cell studies in both cancer and non-cancer human cells that showed that the vast majority of lagging chromosomes have a transient nature and are corrected during anaphase by an Aurora-B-dependent mechanism that prevents micronuclei formation, 46 , 60 and the relatively low frequency of micronuclei formation even after induction of massive chromosome segregation errors by experimental abrogation of the SAC. 61 , 62 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We now show that although most micronuclei derive from anaphase lagging chromosomes, simply because these events occur at a very high frequency in chromosomally unstable cancer cells 55 , chronically misaligned chromosomes that satisfy the SAC often missegregate and have the highest probability to form micronuclei, specifically in human cancer cell models (see graphical abstract). This is consistent with recent high-resolution live-cell studies in both cancer and non-cancer human cells that showed that the vast majority of lagging chromosomes have a transient nature and are corrected during anaphase by an Aurora B-dependent mechanism that prevents micronuclei formation 48, 61 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…To precisely define the relationship between HURP-gaps and kinetochore motion we used lattice-light sheet microscopy and kinetochore tracking to acquire and analyse 3D volumes of hTERT-RPE1 EGFP-HURP/Halo-CENP-A cells every 4.5 s (Movie 4) (17). As metaphase sister-kinetochores oscillated back-and-forth with K-fibres switching from growth to shrinkage, we found that HURP was exclusively present on depolymerizing K-fibres (associated to the leading kinetochore sister), and never on the growing K-fibre (associated to the trailing kinetochore sister) (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%