2013
DOI: 10.4324/9780203795859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kingship and Masculinity in Late Medieval England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 As Katherine Lewis argues, the masculinity of kings has remained largely invisible except in cases where kings "do it wrong" and their deviation from the norms of manhood is used to help explain their status as "bad" kings. 11 And yet it seems clear that the stability and prerogative of monarchical rule was inherently linked with the gendered identity of the man (or woman) who sat upon the throne. As David Kuchta argues, creating a public image of manliness, or having one created, was one way to facilitate the legitimation of power.…”
Section: Image Removed For Copyright Reasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 As Katherine Lewis argues, the masculinity of kings has remained largely invisible except in cases where kings "do it wrong" and their deviation from the norms of manhood is used to help explain their status as "bad" kings. 11 And yet it seems clear that the stability and prerogative of monarchical rule was inherently linked with the gendered identity of the man (or woman) who sat upon the throne. As David Kuchta argues, creating a public image of manliness, or having one created, was one way to facilitate the legitimation of power.…”
Section: Image Removed For Copyright Reasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%